From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDD41F859 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 20:50:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755538AbcHSUub (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Aug 2016 16:50:31 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:55837 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755533AbcHSUua (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Aug 2016 16:50:30 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F8235C5F; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 16:50:24 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=UdwYHVCyZoAg9hccpQZQHpXfYLQ=; b=r7G3s2 RmSB0o9TSE2XhjF/lgnQ4KHBeoe4GJilaltZaBHA+cWa3jVKRb3w3SwXVQkNiNJ5 Ob+NSw6hx76pqnS4qbG73UCA4Zd9qAtzLqZARAF9AsH/CyRtueGxHS5oJr2rNJ2w sA/rGuw87wexU1Wal7zKRNhrr5dHJMYXMP2d8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=VCegwqG+4z3Dqe454Z4yzak8J6+i+kBC 4QouNYlHlLAgvUF/5Y+LzYNjRe2lNfH+UgrKBixwZumtYiaRb/pVh9hH0jjP4qzu c6CDLVmxnHjWxQ5LODxmvwDbEgvpd5ZZ8ttEA+Ga+eJdcpzwfoyBEypxRKvJmbF/ C3bHrL3vxLk= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F256D35C5D; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 16:50:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6633835C5C; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 16:50:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jacob Keller Cc: Jacob Keller , Git mailing list , Stefan Beller , Jeff King , Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 7/8] cache: add empty_tree_oid object References: <20160819000031.24854-1-jacob.e.keller@intel.com> <20160819000031.24854-8-jacob.e.keller@intel.com> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:50:20 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Jacob Keller's message of "Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:35:51 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 8CABEF9A-664E-11E6-BFBE-FCB17B1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jacob Keller writes: > Is there a reason for that? I've found that .field = value is safer > because it ensures that you don't end up initializing the wrong > values? Or is it a compatibility thing? Yes.