From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACB40207EC for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 17:20:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934212AbcI2RUd (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2016 13:20:33 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:59484 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933853AbcI2RUb (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2016 13:20:31 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0679540989; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 13:20:30 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=B9bKLk9k57P3 PM85Ab3Ju37J8h4=; b=TZky29GNMk5uEDDDvOU6jF8sEYdhQZi08O6qh3O8lcIB gWDnF4nzGnGzj9fosO5W2UFb7K34Vgz4UyPRB+kSQrCS6DwCIPUnybXofqKqx0c1 ecQuqkl7ClBbdspI0GrNzrpdbmQfbhXqpLCoQOKTAhS13FXx+AyvhWUMSf0g9h8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=JJ9yoU cZRvQRk7wfZK3RIYjoSDagbCuC0yJOJZg1TOB1jGydb2kIdgf2Mje1n2QRH3D38P pdtQ7Sdvmy3vHTk6T5nQvHzaLHrQEqBkbY5DTTsaACEFd04AH+ZmH0FTSyIANwvu B1GXdWYOiKiYq6ZOgUIvD7oyB4MhvvlIRVQtc= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F151540988; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 13:20:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 760DF40987; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 13:20:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jakub =?utf-8?Q?Nar=C4=99bski?= Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] config: allow customizing /etc/gitconfig location References: <20160928233047.14313-1-gitster@pobox.com> <20160928233047.14313-2-gitster@pobox.com> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:20:27 -0700 In-Reply-To: ("Jakub =?utf-8?Q?Nar=C4=99bski=22's?= message of "Thu, 29 Sep 2016 11:53:10 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 05004A88-8669-11E6-A0CC-EAAE7A1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jakub Nar=C4=99bski writes: > W dniu 29.09.2016 o 01:30, Junio C Hamano pisze: >> With a new environment variable GIT_ETC_GITCONFIG, the users can >> specify a file that is used instead of /etc/gitconfig to read (and >> write) the system-wide configuration. > > Why it is named GIT_ETC_GITCONFIG (which is Unix-ism), and not > GIT_CONFIG_SYSTEM / GIT_CONFIG_SYSTEM_PATH, that is something > OS-neutral? Isn't "environment variable" something that came from POSIX world?