From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E10D1FC96 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 19:46:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756061AbcK2Tqf (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:46:35 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:53538 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751726AbcK2Tqe (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:46:34 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F17774E953; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:46:32 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=DgTRs5DTOH9T1QVZigpZ61qYwK8=; b=JSbTm3 VjNgBz6VVjH0zjYJ5sqOZq3We1akrIF8ZjZPW5XlWtHFb4/EgX20zk9ecDPKa1x9 Qgts5Ru8ahVWRflVChJw8h6kxIoSmVPi6So2vmi5zZfsRWp2jtlzwONOI3n2B39W XN5lbv/bw4KWmbn3aWpyeiQMg4+DShQljtajQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=cLwAxtKUoZqm4QKWSm82W36YojEUDWZ/ snnNRK9pmcGyNgBuIgxMlwojh+sRjrDt3CsRYEwzhN9DEr0mRMb2NBvHHdeP99gv lWw0WObsqG6XB3dwSwzzxbm1P2vQsUyMvQyIbNpqeplmkcmcPnLqGcx2L26PZGEf +4wGvYV8J10= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E939B4E952; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:46:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 804DA4E950; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:46:32 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Eli Barzilay Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: gitconfig includes References: Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 11:46:31 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Eli Barzilay's message of "Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:40:09 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 8760F0E4-B66C-11E6-93B2-E98412518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Eli Barzilay writes: > So this is at least a documentation issue,... This already is documented, and I think it is clear enough. --[no-]includes Respect include.* directives in config files when looking up values. Defaults to off when a specific file is given (e.g., using --file, --global, etc) and on when searching all config files.