From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B321F990 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 20:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728001AbgHEUEM (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2020 16:04:12 -0400 Received: from pb-sasl-trial20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.50]:60717 "EHLO pb-sasl-trial20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727797AbgHEQgh (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2020 12:36:37 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1065 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 12:36:34 EDT Received: from pb-sasl-trial20.pobox.com (localhost.local [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl-trial20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97AE12F0DC; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 12:12:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=msThXjG0oDnb VgpkGdxop9dfugQ=; b=mEUIINkwCcQhPq0hk/3aKCcWvGTVbHQcp0+x9wq4xwWk WoYjRJH6Bk90VY02zMhjCZgbCtKD/DCaWOtPB/3GthqYBuMhqdl+cEWyp/dsjBg6 uMusWt8R712F0n1M1Hag5QSLQOFBY6seZI8OwD36Ui91Jt3EfxDx5Y8j8+pEe80= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=xujXND qFqnMj6aspev35gf3oFQr2t7qrkZ3OTYh89qkIo+Kq/hZw02QK8e4XfipwOi+wN8 jRPJCyXWOb0E0RoK/q3GTYMxQVMJ+h51AvlrSWCxgQV17pMvKHrCj05zcMbt3sXw 3Iv0jTdWL24JZxE0i9g7QiU/sh4LcpcWAMeKI= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (pb-smtp20.pobox.com [10.110.30.20]) by pb-sasl-trial20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA352F0DB; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 12:12:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.196.173.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 984FCDD681; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 12:12:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Martin =?utf-8?Q?=C3=85gren?= Cc: Andreas Schwab , Git Mailing List , Birger Skogeng Pedersen , Birger Skogeng Pedersen , Brandon Williams , Brandon Williams , Damien Robert , Damien Robert , Ed Maste , Fangyi Zhou , Fangyi Zhou , Jiang Xin , Jiang Xin , Kevin Willford , Kevin Willford , Peter Kaestle , Peter Kaestle , Sun Chao , Sun Chao <16657101987@163.com>, Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] Update .mailmap References: <20200805065408.1242617-1-martin.agren@gmail.com> <87eeolo9v9.fsf@linux-m68k.org> Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 09:12:37 -0700 In-Reply-To: ("Martin =?utf-8?Q?=C3=85gren=22's?= message of "Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:09:48 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 7B6191D8-D736-11EA-A0CD-F0EA2EB3C613-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Martin =C3=85gren writes: > (Dropping Jiang Xin's huawei address. It bounces.) > > On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 at 09:00, Andreas Schwab wro= te: >> >> On Aug 05 2020, Martin =C3=85gren wrote: >> >> > --- a/.mailmap >> > +++ b/.mailmap >> > +Andreas Schwab >> >> Neither of them are more recent. > > Thanks, I'll take that as a Nak and drop your entry from the patch. > > Martin FWIW, I do not know the reason why Andreas said the above, but there are folks who contribute to the same project (not limited to this one) sometimes as an individual and sometimes as an employee of a corporation, and want to differenciate which commit is which by using different author names. So migrating old and defunct addresses to the current and working one may be appreciated by the contributors, but we shouldn't make it a goal to have only one canonical form per one physical person. That won't work. Thanks.