From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0FE1F89C for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 18:48:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753196AbdARSs0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2017 13:48:26 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:64238 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751914AbdARSsZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2017 13:48:25 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6805FCD5; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 13:44:05 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=FhwykJG9eEwgJyTubXCbH8Zq7sA=; b=Ml9KsN oJ5/dIT7ByqmJQu6O/hHdyXGbANhVIrwSwT2p7Ow+tMiGuWFF9nfVbcdBl5KTeRq HOHaoCmeXifkvSoV7v4vczvVTh582E/oJfcicwa+78ebc5YujXYZG8UHZMPIXdP4 5PBGBti0SO8mnEz7wgGikJ73dnIonaRw7mnjQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=jvSGcLWfTZF+WWAlM7tKOLLfnmUhIwXK DYBYafEn6Xs9Zyg0ueFFVY1vG9FScb6WhR7jGA9iDn1aoZbu6/6XtFfH7inFAgu/ wWCp/p0Dhzn6M3lHHMOQQjCJNPC7BmZr+hICEHglvpDhdMp98fdfxUpDCTfSg2W1 XCEMpLva4pw= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A095FCD3; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 13:44:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B386C5FCCD; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 13:44:04 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Santiago Torres , meta@public-inbox.org Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net, sunshine@sunshineco.com, walters@verbum.org, Lukas Puehringer , Eric Wong Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] builtin/tag: add --format argument for tag -v References: <20170117233723.23897-1-santiago@nyu.edu> <20170117233723.23897-5-santiago@nyu.edu> <20170118182831.pkhqu2np3bh2puei@LykOS.localdomain> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:44:03 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20170118182831.pkhqu2np3bh2puei@LykOS.localdomain> (Santiago Torres's message of "Wed, 18 Jan 2017 13:28:32 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 16372488-DDAE-11E6-AFFB-FE3F13518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Santiago Torres writes: <>??? Eric, I've noticed that this message http://public-inbox.org/git/20170118182831.pkhqu2np3bh2puei@LykOS.localdomain/ and all messages from Santiago appear empty when they come via public-inbox.org; the reason I suspect we haven't heard much complaints is because nobody else around here sends multipart/signed disposition inline other than Santiago.