From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A841F45E for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 18:34:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728135AbgBMSet (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 13:34:49 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:53310 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725781AbgBMSes (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 13:34:48 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C752753EA5; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 13:34:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=evdfp7i0p6SL8eXx+2x7WPCXFxo=; b=oJlZ9j VRGL5GCbibemqpmWhlBOiN7G2fKoFlHci4Ulr+2FrvyjdzgjFWKuKDr1xZT5fz89 ZdpasVBltolzkAzDr6vnJQt245Jfj44dzlm08J1RogZX0rO8scTvh263NNwlN1IJ yjfm0sODvHzl5XNqPMlfh5RvPPsx0Hd+pyziQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=xoHpJ76ZUQ++GyxyffK7R2Dq8eEWbBYy jKVU51vYIzY4lMKWjs0+axAgg854lO0oHILPmGvM10Ho/bQr7+cmBQi0xX4lVLlV V2HqO3sWe6+p3GxfwpOcW4fdsztbJoNR9s9CtfkvyWcgN602QPnIv0Zo+pTI7esb C6qEbSnypX0= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3DA53EA4; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 13:34:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E38253EA2; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 13:34:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/13] rev-list: factor out bitmap-optimized routines References: <20200213021506.GA1124607@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20200213021820.GE1126038@coredump.intra.peff.net> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:34:45 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20200213021820.GE1126038@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 12 Feb 2020 21:18:20 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 82EC8992-4E8F-11EA-819C-D1361DBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > There are a few operations in rev-list that are optimized for bitmaps. > Rather than having the code inline in cmd_rev_list(), let's move them > into helpers. This not only makes the flow of the main function simpler, > but it lets us replace the complex "can we do the optimization?" > conditionals with a series of early returns from the functions. That > also makes it easy to add comments explaining those conditions. ... and these new comments makes the resulting code much easier to follow. Nicely done.