From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Patrick Hogg <phogg@novamoon.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, pclouds@gmail.com, Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pack-objects: Use packing_data lock instead of read_mutex
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:43:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq1s54e2ju.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190119154337.6556-1-phogg@novamoon.net> (Patrick Hogg's message of "Sat, 19 Jan 2019 10:43:38 -0500")
Patrick Hogg <phogg@novamoon.net> writes:
> As I mentioned in the prior thread I think that it will be simpler
> to simply use the existing lock in packing_data instead of moving
> read_mutex. I can go back to simply moving read_mutex to the
> packing_data struct if that that is preferable, though.
I'll let others comment on this to show preference between the two
approaches.
> I also removed the #ifndef NO_PTHREADS in prepare_packing_data around
> the initialization of &pdata->lock since I had to upgrade the lock to
> a recursive mutex. As far as I can tell init_recursive_mutex (and
> pthread_mutex_init for that matter) have that protection already so it
> appears to be redundant.
If you can defer "I also" to a separate patch, please do so.
Keeping the fix alone as small as possible and not tangled with
other changes would make it easier for people to cherry-pick the fix
to older maintenance tracks if they choose to.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-22 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-19 15:43 [PATCH v2] pack-objects: Use packing_data lock instead of read_mutex Patrick Hogg
2019-01-21 10:02 ` Duy Nguyen
2019-01-22 7:28 ` Jeff King
2019-01-22 10:25 ` Duy Nguyen
2019-01-22 13:13 ` Patrick Hogg
2019-01-22 17:52 ` Elijah Newren
2019-01-22 20:37 ` Elijah Newren
2019-01-22 22:43 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2019-01-22 23:54 ` Patrick Hogg
2019-01-23 17:51 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq1s54e2ju.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=phogg@novamoon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).