From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MALFORMED_FREEMAIL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55AF41F462 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 20:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730248AbfFSU6t (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jun 2019 16:58:49 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:60693 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726175AbfFSU6t (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jun 2019 16:58:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1560977922; bh=lHKxgnKGMOVFBjvJaYz4l+T97ikz9uVelISczlIX5Os=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=VOHMbhUBxascByyyFlkm6Oz0JEHyuQrpPIJicJSJsY4v768CJ8SGW2yE3CHwhYb/X 7scZgntp2SRRcVuZVGl2oTGAuWEc96l2qREqoNhZWLJ9CtdN7kgyY7tN7EbmaOvBo0 cQTc146e6RCW787IqME0m3+v1dg5YDuRaWRzWwao= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [192.168.0.129] ([37.201.192.51]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MEm27-1hoPzF2bRj-00GHIP; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 22:58:42 +0200 Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 22:58:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Johannes Schindelin X-X-Sender: virtualbox@gitforwindows.org To: Johannes Sixt cc: Eric Sunshine , Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , Git List , Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/17] t0001 (mingw): do not expect a specific order of stdout/stderr In-Reply-To: <0841b134-0719-8bda-41ec-abd124157df6@kdbg.org> Message-ID: References: <40cfbb30-c632-54da-62d9-9b31bc878806@kdbg.org> <0841b134-0719-8bda-41ec-abd124157df6@kdbg.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.1 (DEB 209 2017-03-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:ry+PLMVdS+iwYulkBrZGVc0WP/GF6iCMJ4zGEi8QBRymEAAEC1+ WdARPBHqNAzZohxLebEEh0vhBMaBWUMHbaqdHPjQ0ePFraGxzPRVYC1UUKIXfOTDd5O+AAJ qnsLDbKFQa9/r44j8JLQZWIc1e9gxziI4AmC4RMEv2wvMsBa2HOMbEHRkta59n3yNHBSBae 2osr3rB6JjDdUIChhdtmw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:37mltchjI+o=:G4L9YJQslToM1fQOxkoJTf fFl8wXFeXwIC73hXXAuc4i1qlp2FUS2ZQAbG7r8e+lYH72J1mRg+RC9mWAyC5+SL7xubmx+yz sO4iCNikYvFG9DNqtnqopSjlu7eGVYD+2Ist+S5zilk+f9xzpgUP2Gyo1IXMxT+tGIDVFsJVm /DDIEJRywKQIK1LwuhyvCphkXfeU8atTDM+qywPBpV7Wcp9ydqUYmYPnGqQPEkOviwQFZstag rIFSgNg44xEi6cSF5Dw6yS6aQ+HnYM0sm9r0xGwyWnbP8DFK6jFJMwKk3l60vCVHMe7iEDg95 VeWBzIPB8Bl5u+eimQnBcQ7k4BlOF0ARwfpL308jGryxQ4iVbVK9f0MfpKd9ZKQh3C9aBHYGR LZC7EbwYPLEayE7mZ8g2RLWW5I+wqQjNIIDT0cvTHc46pHBAnaGqKcoBBVkI/F6cQ/7HhvUok mgr2DEIi4NGglBy1i/JxFropeUcrECs2eLa2vrOKSp/uiQJF1wmBrgk+Fle/xTP/2jDiw66+l IaaPQrW7rnj7pyVeZSj4qwUCmoySF15FkXRDhgAF5Asx0c977yeOIUlJQ1ImD3XR5OgdICGC1 PATFS7BDWuTrzJHhR9BzqmRiJFDZpFMOqn3tZoJd+trqDOnc9nFtuGGOtr3aDBgA8mZ8epn66 MzfOJ7n1h5zSJGS2Ikp8dHTWF4gx7bgsJlD1ApnHHPVzGrIFjEo0dZ2DLzZ88nxXBu0Uo2V4D xPGp9mftCBr8NGYLPX3MrdcJJ4uv00sm8su6TSKcNs3bk1K712DB1lnjGx5H3v1BSm/0o7OFQ cVc2OrnfbOww4AQb4yPMR5LGSiS9GSKsHY9y7PIgWJbPZp9PCeiAGZ3fiV/xZLGUHBFt4cvoV kGnomi1Kgv3mKe7ktBgOX/72VJ8NRcE1qA6W3hhnJ3vZMoRbul64nLYM4ZjmNyW1RTG5DoPR1 WkRJnx6Dw624U2fBvjoC07GNPOQA8lKoXpuJ6u+mg10JbrYbr5neg Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi Hannes, On Wed, 19 Jun 2019, Johannes Sixt wrote: > Am 19.06.19 um 13:30 schrieb Johannes Schindelin: > > Interesting side note: I just realized that t6050-replace.sh does inde= ed > > contain > > > > test_i18ngrep "Needed a single revision" err > > > > so I wonder why that works. > > Why should it not work? If GIT_TEST_GETTEXT_POISON is on, it pretends > success; otherwise, it does a regular grep. Ah, right, I vaguely remembered that Duy offered patches to do something funny with a pseudo locale (I never understood why not go for the much simpler ROT-13), and I guess that effort never went anywhere. So essentially the test case in t6050 will succeed under GETTEXT_POISON for the wrong reasons. Thanks for explaining this to me! Ciao, Dscho