From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sverre Rabbelier Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 00/14] git notes Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 23:36:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1252376822-6138-1-git-send-email-johan@herland.net> <200909080512.34634.johan@herland.net> <7vd462qdeg.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <200909081054.02523.johan@herland.net> <7vocplxjov.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20090908211046.GV1033@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Junio C Hamano , Johannes Schindelin , Johan Herland , git@vger.kernel.org, trast@student.ethz.ch, tavestbo@trolltech.com, git@drmicha.warpmail.net, chriscool@tuxfamily.org To: "Shawn O. Pearce" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Sep 08 23:37:12 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ml8ND-0007c1-Is for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 23:37:12 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751864AbZIHVgz (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 17:36:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751528AbZIHVgz (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 17:36:55 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f227.google.com ([209.85.219.227]:32995 "EHLO mail-ew0-f227.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751284AbZIHVgy (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 17:36:54 -0400 Received: by ewy27 with SMTP id 27so4071888ewy.40 for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:36:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=H0Ma0fatHzAaS5Okb9XfaErff0b0D+4Y4a6i5Qm8ElM=; b=W8UQ0peb2rm4Ok4tDxU/T8EPqWfZ/57VvY44YZE/tz2qJ2VCfmUlDAdtiNGUgRWnml 1adElM6iZj3O9MOLWjgRVDN9R/LN2a+cv/JotXyA/4J26px0goQWZjedfZIAZG2x8668 iwD2uBbYML3VjcXTa4Fgt4oLVWjko1j+5Jggc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=ovr4Vc34yxm5PFQohDAVT+PYWHqQmXe+VjKnNwqQdT2rqxY6O5r84LodF/7d4bHypl 87xFsaP7kVNIMOEiz8QSR05rJnoYDqlvCFLDueEEJ1l91YAHpb2ZpPoh0xPiZZq4F5CN 1kl4cWI5FOQ9sCANUFG37mNrIOSZejfwD3FcQ= Received: by 10.216.45.78 with SMTP id o56mr3317862web.152.1252445816140; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:36:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090908211046.GV1033@spearce.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Heya, On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 23:10, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > So most commits (66%) would have only 1 version (and 1 note) > related to them in the note tree, but if I use the same note tree > for final commits as individual revisions considered, at least 18% > of the commits in the final history of the project would actually > have two notes, and 7.5% would have 3 notes. You could however store all that information in one note, yes? Since the 'latest version' is the one committed, you can include the notes for all the previous ones at commit time? -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier