From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Git and GCC Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 21:21:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <4aca3dc20712051947t5fbbb383ua1727c652eb25d7e@mail.gmail.com> <20071205.202047.58135920.davem@davemloft.net> <4aca3dc20712052032n521c344cla07a5df1f2c26cb8@mail.gmail.com> <20071205.204848.227521641.davem@davemloft.net> <4aca3dc20712052111o730f6fb6h7a329ee811a70f28@mail.gmail.com> <4aca3dc20712061004g43f5902cw79bf633917d3ade9@mail.gmail.com> <1196995353.22471.20.camel@brick> <9e4733910712062006l651571f3w7f76ce64c6650dff@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Harvey Harrison , Daniel Berlin , David Miller , ismail@pardus.org.tr, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, git@vger.kernel.org To: Jon Smirl X-From: gcc-return-142786-gcc=m.gmane.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Dec 07 06:22:38 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcc@gmane.org Received: from sourceware.org ([209.132.176.174]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J0VfY-0000Wp-OX for gcc@gmane.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 06:22:37 +0100 Received: (qmail 2515 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2007 05:22:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 2503 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Dec 2007 05:22:17 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org (HELO smtp2.linux-foundation.org) (207.189.120.14) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 05:22:11 +0000 Received: from imap1.linux-foundation.org (imap1.linux-foundation.org [207.189.120.55]) by smtp2.linux-foundation.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id lB75Lbdi022171 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 6 Dec 2007 21:21:38 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imap1.linux-foundation.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id lB75LZ6d031437; Thu, 6 Dec 2007 21:21:35 -0800 In-Reply-To: <9e4733910712062006l651571f3w7f76ce64c6650dff@mail.gmail.com> X-MIMEDefang-Filter: lf$Revision: 1.188 $ Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc@gcc.gnu.org Archived-At: On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Jon Smirl wrote: > > > > time git blame -C gcc/regclass.c > /dev/null > > jonsmirl@terra:/video/gcc$ time git blame -C gcc/regclass.c > /dev/null > > real 1m21.967s > user 1m21.329s Well, I was also hoping for a "compared to not-so-aggressive packing" number on the same machine.. IOW, what I was wondering is whether there is a visible performance downside to the deeper delta chains in the 300MB pack vs the (less aggressive) 500MB pack. Linus