From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78CF21F4C0 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 11:06:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728902AbfJMLF6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Oct 2019 07:05:58 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:3192 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728620AbfJMLF6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Oct 2019 07:05:58 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x9DAvEMl060643 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 07:05:57 -0400 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2vkveqq056-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 07:05:56 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 12:05:55 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Sun, 13 Oct 2019 12:05:52 +0100 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x9DB5pm548300184 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 13 Oct 2019 11:05:51 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8454C050; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 11:05:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390B94C04A; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 11:05:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (unknown [9.192.253.14]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 11:05:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.102.57.136] (unknown [9.102.57.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED0CAA00F3; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 22:05:48 +1100 (AEDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] parser: Unmangle From: headers that have been mangled for DMARC purposes To: Jeff King , Daniel Axtens Cc: Jonathan Nieder , Stephen Rothwell , Alexandre Belloni , Christian Schoenebeck , patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org, Eric Blake , git@vger.kernel.org References: <20191010062047.21549-1-ajd@linux.ibm.com> <20191010194132.GA191800@google.com> <20191010225405.GA19475@sigill.intra.peff.net> <06541640-7eca-bc40-5c4b-9aa682d774a8@linux.ibm.com> <87pnj3thja.fsf@dja-thinkpad.axtens.net> <20191011155151.GA19395@sigill.intra.peff.net> From: Andrew Donnellan Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 22:05:49 +1100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191011155151.GA19395@sigill.intra.peff.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-AU Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19101311-4275-0000-0000-00000371A509 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19101311-4276-0000-0000-00003884B201 Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-10-13_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910130112 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 12/10/19 2:51 am, Jeff King wrote: > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 02:42:49AM +1100, Daniel Axtens wrote: > >>>> where a possible solution was to get senders to use in-body From >>>> headers even when sending their own patches. >> [...] >> I'm not sure this solution is correct. >> >> If I take a patch from Andrew, backport it, and send to the list, Andrew >> will be listed in the in-body From. However, he shouldn't be the sender >> from the Patchwork point of view: he shouldn't get the patch status >> notification emails - I should. We don't want to spam an original author >> if their patch is backported to several different releases, or picked up >> and resent in someone else's series, etc etc. So unless I've >> misunderstood something, we can't rely on the in-body from matching >> Patchwork's understanding of the sender. > > Yeah, it may be that patchwork and git have two different priorities > here. From my perspective, the problem is getting the patch into a git > repo with the right author name. But patchwork may want to make the > distinction between author and sender. > Yes, I was referring to the git am case, not the Patchwork case. -- Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra ajd@linux.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited