From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85D01F9FD for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 13:53:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235104AbhCPNxN (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Mar 2021 09:53:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43424 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234413AbhCPNwu (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Mar 2021 09:52:50 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-x131.google.com (mail-il1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::131]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 548A2C06174A for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 06:52:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-x131.google.com with SMTP id g9so12749221ilc.3 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 06:52:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ttaylorr-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=Y82LxAaUWkgG2ulTWTXEFS6VX5p+SEiXEu8L8jD/chE=; b=jI8LdyHC45mUpAZWe52+wwnFPTpJoy57vZjBKdM4HYT7chDsSUnbh+JMkQ4cb8aN4v lsBLMtWuF/eDcvxGZ+3waSxmUmifHJZwCRq0vEzrD9OhH5gEhW3DVm7wv8rfDCZ7pJB1 3g85zfozWBGsna+ACQEJFle+6l4QXaNoP1tJIJmzND5Ydzc1NZk8O5suGEoJkWjNqipG vKaGR/WMR5iQ3OHGvKVV8j0pvBzUonzJttKy57HL7cQLQX55SRPO5ogfaXqIAIqPGr42 3+DUi1N/y7eoawiT2Ya2+fvgLbAYxjJxUB6d9etGhVCgK0c+ZRPFR5SIyp5W5+Fjwik7 ZOdw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=Y82LxAaUWkgG2ulTWTXEFS6VX5p+SEiXEu8L8jD/chE=; b=VKfb1YJCacQlvpVb9/2qpbhsK++HybQ+We4+MSTbinGc5ohh/SCFDAJ4/ZNKMN483z RtkAkB7vByiGnuir5qJDquIbn2R4jWT1yYPFVbUdsDkA7kH88hq4YMDeNwKwJUWai3wi fw4OJ2XKv/Ye3TQ5VMjNLZaJKsGx7ziGjt2myjeltjV35o98YvfwZuWsCU2tHUNCYi9r zZawfZWrL71kVkY1X0Rq8loEk3NaFwShjQMChoJQvLmaXDKAaqRzNH3s3+grMKTgwSe+ t4G76Bcp26lVdqQO/15urZrFgdncFaforB9iHz5hapTVcdt8IxcsmXQjm8Fx+lmu+lBM V6uA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533UDz120lpGNB6iDW9gTcHEYkoCUv4iEs8zCGUqNM8Ce0+3pEdX vQSXtxJdjdryRB6u6XaWiMAIwg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx7T2kP00fiW3+ZN8pWwyR2BuRFKh5gNrw2yj2NYnNplDg4hyLqonl15xPvUIlQNCFa2FVcVg== X-Received: by 2002:a92:6b0e:: with SMTP id g14mr3993044ilc.246.1615902769636; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 06:52:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2605:9480:22e:ff10:aa35:f9c6:aa86:b530]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k125sm8702149iof.14.2021.03.16.06.52.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 16 Mar 2021 06:52:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 09:52:47 -0400 From: Taylor Blau To: Son Luong Ngoc Cc: git , Taylor Blau , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Subject: Re: Tests failed with GIT_TEST_FAIL_PREREQS and/or GIT_TEST_PROTOCOL_VERSION Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 10:45:20AM +0100, Son Luong Ngoc wrote: > Hi folks, > > Running the test suit with GIT_TEST_FAIL_PREREQS=1 on master (and > next) seem to result in some failures: Ack, thanks for reporting. > A quick git-bisect run seems to point back to this commit: > > 3b1ca60f8f317b483c8c1805ab500ff2b014cbec is the first bad commit > commit 3b1ca60f8f317b483c8c1805ab500ff2b014cbec > Author: Taylor Blau > Date: Tue Dec 8 17:03:14 2020 -0500 Hmm. I get a different result. $ cat run.sh #!/bin/sh make -j20 DEVELOPER=1 O=0 && cd t && GIT_TEST_FAIL_PREREQS=1 ./t5300-*.sh -i $ git bisect start $ git bisect bad $ git bisect good v2.30.0 Bisecting: 453 revisions left to test after this (roughly 9 steps) $ git bisect run $PWD/run.sh [snip] a926c4b904bdc339568c2898af955cdc61b31542 is the first bad commit commit a926c4b904bdc339568c2898af955cdc61b31542 Author: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason Date: Thu Feb 11 02:53:51 2021 +0100 tests: remove most uses of C_LOCALE_OUTPUT > ewah/ewah_bitmap.c: avoid open-coding ALLOC_GROW() I'll take a look at what's going on here, but Ævar (cc'd) will probably beat me to it. Is it possible that your bisection script doesn't report success properly? Bisecting the same range (v2.30.0..v2.31.0) with $ cat run.sh #!/bin/sh false does say that my 3b1ca60f8f (ewah/ewah_bitmap.c: avoid open-coding ALLOC_GROW(), 2020-12-08) is the first bad commit. Thanks, Taylor