From: David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: SHA1 hash safety
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 05:24:24 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0504160519330.21837@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz> (raw)
this issue was raised a few days ago in the context of someone tampering
with the files and it was decided that the extra checks were good enough
to prevent this (at least for now), but what about accidental collisions?
if I am understanding things right the objects get saved in the filesystem
in filenames that are the SHA1 hash. of two legitimate files have the same
hash I don't see any way for both of them to exist.
yes the risk of any two files having the same has is low, but in the
earlier thread someone chimed in and said that they had two files on their
system that had the same hash..
David Lang
--
There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies.
-- C.A.R. Hoare
next reply other threads:[~2005-04-16 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-16 12:24 David Lang [this message]
2005-04-16 12:31 ` SHA1 hash safety Ingo Molnar
2005-04-16 12:48 ` David Lang
2005-04-16 13:29 ` Brian O'Mahoney
2005-04-16 14:58 ` C. Scott Ananian
2005-04-16 15:11 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-16 15:36 ` C. Scott Ananian
2005-04-16 22:56 ` David Lang
2005-04-16 23:11 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-16 23:18 ` Martin Mares
2005-04-17 4:38 ` David A. Wheeler
2005-04-18 0:09 ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-04-16 15:49 ` ross
2005-04-17 6:35 ` Horst von Brand
2005-04-18 2:07 ` Brian O'Mahoney
2005-04-18 16:50 ` C. Scott Ananian
2005-04-16 19:16 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-16 21:35 ` Brian O'Mahoney
2005-04-18 7:43 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-04-18 17:04 ` C. Scott Ananian
2005-04-19 22:30 ` David Meybohm
2005-04-19 22:48 ` C. Scott Ananian
2005-04-20 18:56 ` David Meybohm
2005-04-16 22:46 ` David Lang
2005-04-16 23:14 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-16 22:33 ` David Lang
2005-04-17 3:23 ` Tkil
2005-04-17 4:09 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-17 4:43 ` Tkil
2005-04-17 5:09 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.62.0504160519330.21837@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz \
--to=david.lang@digitalinsight.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).