From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8173B1F8C1 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 05:52:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728006AbgEEFwg convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2020 01:52:36 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com ([209.85.221.65]:38634 "EHLO mail-wr1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726551AbgEEFwf (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2020 01:52:35 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id x17so1165625wrt.5 for ; Mon, 04 May 2020 22:52:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZDZhN8eZUo6NaGxAX9PbSXH3HYrienvjNPrzJWNZw4E=; b=Iww3tfcQBEHHBzxT/GlCsqQ/de0y56QKRyQ2Q49sy9ILmJfS8DVLqX/Mld7fcM6u+/ JePDbelVXyf5wYXUaUxPmMFMePKIaIThzIEPdr9QBbvpTKuM5iarlOdNl5LrcKFANYI6 fqPxdIl9yN7LYPt6t7SI5CnQwbUzH1lz9ocYLPdAo0ji1WutX46OFqCEofsFFAsCTh0+ SkAxW1OcscTDYdQ7foWsF+Neg25Gn6s6ossvtMc1GO9JqtHvo7YqHFtsuaknobmega5K aDHvef6QGB2QWx0t7HAdKkuDNbMGvEuBzgOIhrzvRGl40hoOHLqGCQD8cC01lDpDeP5Y P4IQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZB6yTKkQXsS4VDcJFYV78CLgMlng2fsjGnpdzbUR0lfTzYkQgo 0AAscQWuR6d7TDAdEeDh2FeiObIXdU7yJk7aANv88Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJyW+yNnQfHh8aCECcnmqhLwlMTCWsd3egcZpKt+qehZ5hoQP+0Zbc6yrsdIikawRY61U8IInzbzOdt4wfQ7sM= X-Received: by 2002:adf:f786:: with SMTP id q6mr1630106wrp.120.1588657954197; Mon, 04 May 2020 22:52:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200505054630.5821-1-carenas@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20200505054630.5821-1-carenas@gmail.com> From: Eric Sunshine Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 01:52:23 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] builtin/receive-pack: avoid generic function name hmac To: =?UTF-8?Q?Carlo_Marcelo_Arenas_Bel=C3=B3n?= Cc: Git List , "brian m. carlson" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 1:46 AM Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón wrote: > [...] > While the conflict, posses the question of why are we even implementing our > own RFC 2104 complaint HMAC while alternatives are readily available, the > simplest solution is to make sure the name is not as generic so it would > conflict with an equivalent one from the system (or linked libraries); so > rename it again to hmac_hash to reflect it will use the git's defined hash > function. > --- Missing sign-off.