From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9E31F6C1 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 05:56:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757582AbcHYF4o (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Aug 2016 01:56:44 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-f173.google.com ([209.85.216.173]:34688 "EHLO mail-qt0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757548AbcHYF4n (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Aug 2016 01:56:43 -0400 Received: by mail-qt0-f173.google.com with SMTP id u25so18204671qtb.1 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 22:56:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FPRgPiMEnUqVZJrgDCDLjJOkOBjH/+bneE9XJuX41og=; b=KLUzmFzslWcWv9M0uQVSu392Ah9DQpTGR8L3qoJSVmmpaGh2jsYYVda1WBm2UBkZzK wVDx3XqK6wP9YyBydr6hGTsQ6WHN7TswSlrKAi5qTIaYetuM32X0ax+aUX0QpmDoO4zd 98NPZ3xTpm60LFG0iafyMbdz+YzoKt+iNl9ophg3bcLxGxHh2VyrUL3VZTvxuqBaBxaV WFjiaqU7BmJpOCrHkPNX99B/oTbkHQlyviYePwCsiFp3KaR19LwVN/rHOSbt5WRslmy5 +8xzl2e9dvZOgQWGT1G6a7TCH36zi2i8T5GaLXFicIpPZkciEObu3NYnmj/5Mw1ziT/o BrLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FPRgPiMEnUqVZJrgDCDLjJOkOBjH/+bneE9XJuX41og=; b=AHkhFV3+GdPj9+32/wlpt2eyKkb1vV6qrepwbpJVQhKk0bVaJZ/Vo+ZUSj0TXjhPaY CTOIFKWdojt4rb69TDKbB0DFpK36k+jqDJFEli4d47uV2aqzIBsBghUgnTl4hKqEswdg 8ARJBB2TxQMPHpaGmOsq/MGSTF0UKtnPVAmEWxi3YPxmBfG7eTl5Xj0721jLeRKfgFp5 2o/kW7oZqXVI2Hi25kKAMXYTEsITu10Cqml3IrOqCtpu7VOVf5lyV9vFl8fIKYTNJf1S ybcoc5fy0YSXZFgPs4Y4zBDAyXhxJUoCHD6hqBtdmRSlevVdn0iC90tyEAZgdna7waHF npbA== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPfsvgah/E7Uo3qEjYe722yufX60WZCmRF5Zhu7TC9+8R6vzzSZ4Hvdbv9Nf1dGYScUOzQQP4SNun6QGQ== X-Received: by 10.237.38.35 with SMTP id z32mr8219540qtc.69.1472104602731; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 22:56:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.42.82 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 22:56:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160824183358.ahxcgcrg7jo2rygp@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20160822173528.755-1-oystwa@gmail.com> <20160824180730.mqlvhkthg4imd2vy@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160824183358.ahxcgcrg7jo2rygp@sigill.intra.peff.net> From: Karthik Nayak Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:26:12 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] for-each-ref: add %(upstream:gone) to mark missing refs To: Jeff King Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=98ystein_Walle?= , Git Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Jeff King wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 08:26:26PM +0200, =C3=98ystein Walle wrote: > >> In the mean time, however, I have discovered that this conflicts with >> kn/ref-filter-branch-list in pu. In that topic this specific feature is >> implemented as well. They incorporate it into %(upstream:track) instead >> of having a separate "sub-atom" (what's the correct nomenclature, by the >> way?) more in line with with branch -vv and your idea. > I'm thinking more on the lines of `%(upstream)` being an atom and the `:track` being an option under that atom. I like sub-atom though ;) > Ah, right. I was feeling like this was all vaguely familiar. I think it > would be better to push forward kn/ref-filter-branch-list. According to > the last "what's cooking", I think that topic is waiting on more review. > If you're willing and able to do so, that would be a big help. > It's been waiting for review for a _long_ time now. --=20 Regards, Karthik Nayak