From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Vincent van Ravesteijn <vfr@lyx.org>,
John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>,
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] build: get rid of the notion of a git library
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 23:15:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMP44s0r96ByEs3+N1Qo+O18rOmT72rHk4zAEFAyFdU_DsQ8wA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vwqq1ct0g.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
>> And I do not see the reason why builtin/*.o should not depend on
>> each other. It is not messed up at all. They are meant to be
>> linked into a single binary---that is what being "built-in" is.
>>
>> A good way forward, the way it *SHOULD* be, is to slim the builtin/*.o
>> by moving parts that do not have to be in the single "git" binary
>> but are also usable in standalone binaries out of them.
>
> Actually, as long as these pieces are currently used by builtins,
> moving them (e.g. init_copy_notes_for_rewrite()) out of builtin/*.o
> will not make these parts not to be in the single "git" binary at
> all, so the above is grossly misstated.
>
> - There may be pieces of usefully reusable code buried in
> builtin/*.o;
>
> - By definition, any code (piece of data or function definition) in
> builtin/*.o cannot be used in standalone binaries, because all of
> builtin/*.o expect to link with git.o and expect their cmd_foo()
> getting called from main in it;
>
> - By moving the useful reusable pieces ont of builtin/*.o and
> adding them to libgit.a, these pieces become usable from
> standalone binaries as well.
What if these reusable pieces should not be used by standalone binaries?
> And that is the reason why slimming builtin/*.o is the way it
> *SHOULD* be.
>
> Another thing to think about is looking at pieces of data and
> functions defined in each *.o files and moving things around within
> them. For example, looking at the dependency chain I quoted earlier
> for sequencer.o to build upload-pack, which is about responding to
> "git fetch" on the sending side:
>
> upload-pack.c wants handle_revision_opt etc.
> revision.c provides handle_revision_opt
> wants name_decoration etc.
> log-tree.c provides name_decoration
> wants append_signoff
> sequencer.c provides append_signoff
>
> It is already crazy. There is no reason for the pack sender to be
> linking with the sequencer interpreter machinery. If the function
> definition (and possibly other ones) are split into separate source
> files (still in libgit.a), git-upload-pack binary does not have to
> pull in the whole sequencer.c at all.
Agreed, which is precisely why my patches move that code out of
sequencer.c. Maybe log-tree.c is not the right destination, but it is
a step in the right direction.
> Coming back to the categorization Peff earlier made in the thread, I
> think I am OK with adding new two subdirectories to the root level,
> i.e.
>
> builtin/ - the ones that define cmd_foo()
As is the case right now.
> commands/ - the ones that has main() for standalone commands
Good.
> libsrc/ - the ones that go in libgit.a
lib/ is probably descriptive enough.
But this doesn't answer the question; what about code that is shared
between builtins, but cannot be used by standalone programs?
I'd wager it belongs to builtin/ and should be linked to
builtin/lib.a. Maybe you would like to have a separate builtin/lib/
directory, but I think that's overkill.
> We may also want to add another subdirectory to hold scripted
> Porcelains, but the primary topic of this thread is what to do about
> the C library, so it is orthogonal in that sense, but if we were to
> go in the "group things in subdirectories to slim the root level"
> direction, it may be worth considering doing so at the same time.
Agreed. Plus there's completions, shell prompt, and other script-like
tools that shouldn't really belong in contrib/, and probably installed
by default.
--
Felipe Contreras
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-11 4:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-08 17:29 [PATCH] build: get rid of the notion of a git library Felipe Contreras
2013-06-08 18:02 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-06-08 18:22 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-09 14:56 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-06-09 15:12 ` John Keeping
2013-06-09 15:40 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-09 16:02 ` John Keeping
2013-06-09 16:22 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-09 16:42 ` John Keeping
2013-06-09 17:03 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-06-09 17:12 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-06-09 17:13 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-09 17:32 ` John Keeping
2013-06-09 17:45 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-09 16:36 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-06-09 17:30 ` Vincent van Ravesteijn
2013-06-09 17:35 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-10 21:45 ` Jeff King
2013-06-10 21:52 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-10 22:06 ` Jeff King
2013-06-10 22:22 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-10 23:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-10 23:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-10 23:51 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-11 0:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-11 1:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-11 4:15 ` Felipe Contreras [this message]
2013-06-11 17:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-11 17:41 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-11 17:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-11 18:06 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-11 18:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-06-11 19:15 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-11 19:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-11 20:12 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-12 0:12 ` [PATCH 0/3] Refactor useful notes functions into notes-utils.[ch] Johan Herland
2013-06-12 0:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] finish_copy_notes_for_rewrite(): Let caller provide commit message Johan Herland
2013-06-12 17:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-12 0:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] Move copy_note_for_rewrite + friends from builtin/notes.c to notes-utils.c Johan Herland
2013-06-12 0:32 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-12 7:10 ` Johan Herland
2013-06-12 18:28 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-12 19:14 ` Johan Herland
2013-06-12 19:18 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-13 6:45 ` Andreas Krey
2013-06-13 13:13 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-12 20:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-12 0:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] Move create_notes_commit() from notes-merge.c into notes-utils.c Johan Herland
2013-06-12 20:02 ` [PATCH 0/3] Refactor useful notes functions into notes-utils.[ch] Junio C Hamano
2013-06-12 20:11 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-13 17:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-13 18:16 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-13 18:50 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-11 18:17 ` [PATCH] build: get rid of the notion of a git library Junio C Hamano
2013-06-11 19:01 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-11 19:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-06-11 19:49 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-11 4:04 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-06-09 15:41 ` Felipe Contreras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMP44s0r96ByEs3+N1Qo+O18rOmT72rHk4zAEFAyFdU_DsQ8wA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=john@keeping.me.uk \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=vfr@lyx.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).