From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1E41FEB3 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 19:30:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763416AbdAITaZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2017 14:30:25 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-f178.google.com ([209.85.223.178]:35721 "EHLO mail-io0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751456AbdAITaY (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2017 14:30:24 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-f178.google.com with SMTP id j18so41558405ioe.2 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 11:30:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9dS4FSTbWYxklvoe5KKialgjFGfhm4X03B2wJbkptUI=; b=kRXZ8fs7Uz9xkOCNIDct21x9GvknxQnkNgmXBrMl9AAxIeIZEUvk7146+qFz+IBrBf gwlzpkvbAcl5t2bmgqdc0hpGaGpmRlJms28vYNDVOWeAXkFUtvRu48oK0VE3E2aLWCmq luex3ZNzXm2tRP3wTjcy9Nxk6MWYLA2Ot99SPXF5ma0T3IeOE3mI9TDaQVpsYygsYXRG hJHUdTcLDh0+BnfMQh4QYlG8L6FPDQDpF9k3rOewhdJHwYVVueQU6qqcqk1lTYKcqEGI xvws9ZhcLiaaubsUQ5IFKCYVBCRppsIV6JvmGDS3aARhFq8fZiNmODD+rQDfhgCof1Sn uvuw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9dS4FSTbWYxklvoe5KKialgjFGfhm4X03B2wJbkptUI=; b=Txokp8LeIqk+ZXnbnwJ+yzsVBtY1MdjbNWbNyojIB41AsgRn9k3Qpq6wBDMg5Hi1TB vq+wYh6tY2C834S1AsKVBpCmyW4L3/YGeIpZE//g2ZO2Ni7pclnuE/9/4g+L6QvzbYWc ty1NWqarE4yg1184KU0xEiHuxQ6VhexuibDU3fQK9eVacikKOnWXgxBOlLz2ez5MZ7eF fOu0ZwSOtERZ7M37D07koZws8xRtUm3Typ44dEGsS+NR7c5omAKimBLt1Q5uN3XypbXq YXI1KtpzEtpEwOc0kV8MUyK9NgpQ6lT0HGU5+QEBzs0Pzwu4UbwIOKlexRWfB8k3Wwqr 0h/A== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXK+CuSA63mizxEct35EEWOQe3LPGvwLMosMATrXz5Dt7XMFF4r5ZnwbVxcdrWSvYcr05qL9CtVqmxceIpUs X-Received: by 10.107.16.14 with SMTP id y14mr7579732ioi.164.1483990223067; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 11:30:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.39.19 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 11:30:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20170107013602.act7aouuzgzpwb54@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20170106210330.31761-1-sbeller@google.com> <20170106210330.31761-5-sbeller@google.com> <20170107013602.act7aouuzgzpwb54@sigill.intra.peff.net> From: Stefan Beller Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 11:30:22 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] unpack-trees: factor file removal out of check_updates To: Jeff King Cc: Junio C Hamano , =?UTF-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9_Scharfe?= , "git@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Jeff King wrote: >> +static int remove_workingtree_files(struct unpack_trees_options *o, >> + unsigned cnt = 0; > > "cnt" is unsigned here, as it is in the caller. Should the return value > match? Yes, obviously. :/ Thanks for catching, Stefan