git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Justin Donnelly <justinrdonnelly@gmail.com>
To: Joakim Petersen <joak-pet@online.no>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
	"Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] git-prompt: make colourization consistent
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2022 13:30:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGTqyRxS9aBitVivSTqojX_C_VBdgrD7JkUKgKSE6apjabzvQg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220604161333.54627-1-joak-pet@online.no>

On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 12:13 PM Joakim Petersen <joak-pet@online.no> wrote:
>
> The short upstream state indicator inherits the colour of the last short
> state indicator before it (if there is one), and the sparsity state
> indicator inherits this colour as well. Make the colourization of these
> state indicators consistent by making all colourized indicators clear
> their own colour.
>
> As of 0ec7c23cdc6 (git-prompt: make upstream state indicator location
> consistent, 2022-02-27), colourization in the output of __git_ps1 has
> changed such that the short upstream state indicator inherits the colour
> of the last short state indicator before it (if there is one), while
> before this change it was white/the default text colour. Some examples
> to illustrate this behaviour (assuming all indicators are enabled and
> colourization is on):
>  * If there is something in the stash, both the '$' and the short
>    upstream state indicator following it will be blue.
>  * If the local tree has new, untracked files and there is nothing in
>    the stash, both the '%' and the    short upstream state indicator
>    will be red.
>  * If all local changes are added to the index and the stash is empty,
>    both the '+' and the short upstream state indicator following it will
>    be green.
>  * If the local tree is clean and there is nothing in the stash, the
>    short upstream state indicator will be white/${default text colour}.
>
> This appears to be an unintended side-effect of the change, and makes
> little sense semantically (e.g. why is it bad to be in sync with
> upstream when you have uncommitted local changes?). The cause of the
> change is that previously, the short upstream state indicator appeared
> immediately after the rebase/revert/bisect/merge state indicator (note
> the position of $p in $gitstring):
>
>         local f="$h$w$i$s$u"
>         local gitstring="$c$b${f:+$z$f}${sparse}$r$p"
>
> Said indicator is prepended with the clear colour code, and the short
> upstream state indicator is thus also uncoloured. Now, the short
> upstream state indicator follows the sequence of colourized indicators,
> without any clearing of colour (again note the position of $p, now in
> $f):
>
>         local f="$h$w$i$s$u$p"
>         local gitstring="$c$b${f:+$z$f}${sparse}$r${upstream}"
>
> If the user is in a sparse checkout, the sparsity state indicator
> follows a similar pattern to the short upstream state indicator.
> However, clearing colour of the colourized indicators changes how the
> sparsity state indicator is colourized , as it currently inherits (and
> before the change referenced also inherited) the colour of the last
> short state indicator before it. Reading the commit message of the
> change that introduced the sparsity state indicator, afda36dbf3b
> (git-prompt: include sparsity state as well, 2020-06-21), it appears
> this colourization also was unintended, so clearing the colour for said
> indicator further increases consistency.
>
> Colouring of $c was made dependent on it not being empty, as it is no
> longer being used to colour the branch name. Removal of $b's prefix was
> moved to before the colourization so it gets cleared properly now that
> colour codes are inserted into it.
>
> Due to colour clearing being moved into the variables for each coloured
> indicator, the tests for the coloured Bash prompt had to be changed:
>  * All colour tests now have the colour codes around the expected
>    content of the expanded $__git_ps1_branch_name variable instead of
>    the unexpanded variable in the string.
>  * The test with two indicators had a clear-colour code inserted after
>    the symbol for the first indicator, since all indicators clear their
>    own colours now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joakim Petersen <joak-pet@online.no>
> ---
> Changes since v3:
>  * All colourized variables now also clear their own colour.
>  * Variables are only coloured if they are not empty, except $b (branch
>    name), which is not an optional indicator.
>  * Updated tests to reflect the new colourization behaviour.
>  * Fixed a mistake in two of the examples; the stash indicator is the
>    last of the short state indicators preceding the short upstream state
>    indicator.
>
> Range-diff against v3:
> 1:  0e107d0496 < -:  ---------- git-prompt: make colourization consistent
> -:  ---------- > 1:  98ce78ddc5 git-prompt: make colourization consistent
>
>  contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh | 20 +++++++++++---------
>  t/t9903-bash-prompt.sh           | 18 +++++++++---------
>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh b/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh
> index 87b2b916c0..32bb98bb8d 100644
> --- a/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh
> +++ b/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh
> @@ -245,7 +245,8 @@ __git_ps1_show_upstream ()
>
>  # Helper function that is meant to be called from __git_ps1.  It
>  # injects color codes into the appropriate gitstring variables used
> -# to build a gitstring.
> +# to build a gitstring. Colored variables are responsible for clearing
> +# their own color.
>  __git_ps1_colorize_gitstring ()
>  {
>         if [[ -n ${ZSH_VERSION-} ]]; then
> @@ -271,22 +272,23 @@ __git_ps1_colorize_gitstring ()
>         else
>                 branch_color="$bad_color"
>         fi
> -       c="$branch_color$c"
> +       if [ -n "$c" ]; then
> +               c="$branch_color$c$c_clear"
> +       fi
> +       b="$branch_color$b$c_clear"
>
> -       z="$c_clear$z"
>         if [ "$w" = "*" ]; then
> -               w="$bad_color$w"
> +               w="$bad_color$w$c_clear"
>         fi
>         if [ -n "$i" ]; then
> -               i="$ok_color$i"
> +               i="$ok_color$i$c_clear"
>         fi
>         if [ -n "$s" ]; then
> -               s="$flags_color$s"
> +               s="$flags_color$s$c_clear"
>         fi
>         if [ -n "$u" ]; then
> -               u="$bad_color$u"
> +               u="$bad_color$u$c_clear"
>         fi
> -       r="$c_clear$r"
>  }
>
>  # Helper function to read the first line of a file into a variable.
> @@ -554,6 +556,7 @@ __git_ps1 ()
>                 fi
>         fi
>
> +       b=${b##refs/heads/}
>         local z="${GIT_PS1_STATESEPARATOR-" "}"
>
>         # NO color option unless in PROMPT_COMMAND mode or it's Zsh
> @@ -563,7 +566,6 @@ __git_ps1 ()
>                 fi
>         fi
>
> -       b=${b##refs/heads/}
>         if [ $pcmode = yes ] && [ $ps1_expanded = yes ]; then
>                 __git_ps1_branch_name=$b
>                 b="\${__git_ps1_branch_name}"
> diff --git a/t/t9903-bash-prompt.sh b/t/t9903-bash-prompt.sh
> index bbd513bab0..abd82eec35 100755
> --- a/t/t9903-bash-prompt.sh
> +++ b/t/t9903-bash-prompt.sh
> @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - pc mode' '
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - branch name' '
> -       printf "BEFORE: (${c_green}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear}):AFTER\\nmain" >expected &&
> +       printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name}):AFTER\\n${c_green}main${c_clear}" >expected &&
>         (
>                 GIT_PS1_SHOWCOLORHINTS=y &&
>                 __git_ps1 "BEFORE:" ":AFTER" >"$actual" &&
> @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - branch name' '
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - detached head' '
> -       printf "BEFORE: (${c_red}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear}):AFTER\\n(%s...)" $(git log -1 --format="%h" b1^) >expected &&
> +       printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name}):AFTER\\n${c_red}(%s...)"${c_clear} $(git log -1 --format="%h" b1^) >expected &&
>         git checkout b1^ &&
>         test_when_finished "git checkout main" &&
>         (
> @@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - detached head' '
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - dirty status indicator - dirty worktree' '
> -       printf "BEFORE: (${c_green}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear} ${c_red}*${c_clear}):AFTER\\nmain" >expected &&
> +       printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name} ${c_red}*${c_clear}):AFTER\\n${c_green}main${c_clear}" >expected &&
>         echo "dirty" >file &&
>         test_when_finished "git reset --hard" &&
>         (
> @@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - dirty status indicator - dirt
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - dirty status indicator - dirty index' '
> -       printf "BEFORE: (${c_green}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear} ${c_green}+${c_clear}):AFTER\\nmain" >expected &&
> +       printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name} ${c_green}+${c_clear}):AFTER\\n${c_green}main${c_clear}" >expected &&
>         echo "dirty" >file &&
>         test_when_finished "git reset --hard" &&
>         git add -u &&
> @@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - dirty status indicator - dirt
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - dirty status indicator - dirty index and worktree' '
> -       printf "BEFORE: (${c_green}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear} ${c_red}*${c_green}+${c_clear}):AFTER\\nmain" >expected &&
> +       printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name} ${c_red}*${c_clear}${c_green}+${c_clear}):AFTER\\n${c_green}main${c_clear}" >expected &&
>         echo "dirty index" >file &&
>         test_when_finished "git reset --hard" &&
>         git add -u &&
> @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - dirty status indicator - dirt
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - dirty status indicator - before root commit' '
> -       printf "BEFORE: (${c_green}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear} ${c_green}#${c_clear}):AFTER\\nmain" >expected &&
> +       printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name} ${c_green}#${c_clear}):AFTER\\n${c_green}main${c_clear}" >expected &&
>         (
>                 GIT_PS1_SHOWDIRTYSTATE=y &&
>                 GIT_PS1_SHOWCOLORHINTS=y &&
> @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - dirty status indicator - befo
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - inside .git directory' '
> -       printf "BEFORE: (${c_green}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear}):AFTER\\nGIT_DIR!" >expected &&
> +       printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name}):AFTER\\n${c_green}GIT_DIR!${c_clear}" >expected &&
>         echo "dirty" >file &&
>         test_when_finished "git reset --hard" &&
>         (
> @@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - inside .git directory' '
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - stash status indicator' '
> -       printf "BEFORE: (${c_green}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear} ${c_lblue}\$${c_clear}):AFTER\\nmain" >expected &&
> +       printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name} ${c_lblue}\$${c_clear}):AFTER\\n${c_green}main${c_clear}" >expected &&
>         echo 2 >file &&
>         git stash &&
>         test_when_finished "git stash drop" &&
> @@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - stash status indicator' '
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'prompt - bash color pc mode - untracked files status indicator' '
> -       printf "BEFORE: (${c_green}\${__git_ps1_branch_name}${c_clear} ${c_red}%%${c_clear}):AFTER\\nmain" >expected &&
> +       printf "BEFORE: (\${__git_ps1_branch_name} ${c_red}%%${c_clear}):AFTER\\n${c_green}main${c_clear}" >expected &&
>         (
>                 GIT_PS1_SHOWUNTRACKEDFILES=y &&
>                 GIT_PS1_SHOWCOLORHINTS=y &&
> --
> 2.36.1
>

I like this solution. This isn't new, but does anybody know if there
is a reason why `$w` is compared for equality to "*" as opposed to
just checking whether it's a nonempty value (`-n`)? I think I'd
generally prefer it to be consistent with the others, which has the
added benefit of continuing to work if the asterisk is ever changed to
something else.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-04 17:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-01 13:44 [RFC PATCH] git-prompt: make colourization consistent Joakim Petersen
2022-06-01 14:47 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-06-01 18:26   ` Joakim Petersen
2022-06-01 18:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-06-01 18:32   ` Joakim Petersen
2022-06-01 20:45     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-06-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v2] " Joakim Petersen
2022-06-02 21:56   ` joak-pet
2022-06-02 22:49   ` Junio C Hamano
2022-06-03 13:55     ` Joakim Petersen
2022-06-03 14:25   ` [PATCH v3] " Joakim Petersen
2022-06-03 16:38     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-06-03 17:23       ` Joakim Petersen
2022-06-03 18:51         ` Joakim Petersen
2022-06-03 19:43           ` Justin Donnelly
2022-06-03 21:16             ` Junio C Hamano
2022-06-04  9:42               ` Joakim Petersen
2022-06-06 16:13                 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-06-03 20:50         ` Junio C Hamano
2022-06-04 16:13     ` [PATCH v4] " Joakim Petersen
2022-06-04 17:30       ` Justin Donnelly [this message]
2022-06-04 19:18         ` Joakim Petersen
2022-06-04 19:26       ` [PATCH v5] " Joakim Petersen
2022-06-06  7:23         ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-06-07 16:04           ` Junio C Hamano
2022-06-09 11:25             ` Joakim Petersen
2022-06-06 16:29         ` Junio C Hamano
2022-06-06 17:31           ` Joakim Petersen
2022-06-06 17:41             ` Junio C Hamano
2022-06-07 11:49               ` Joakim Petersen
2022-06-06 17:50         ` [PATCH v6] " Joakim Petersen
2022-06-07 11:50           ` [PATCH v7] " Joakim Petersen
2022-06-07 16:22             ` Junio C Hamano
2022-06-09 11:16               ` Joakim Petersen
2022-06-09  9:03             ` SZEDER Gábor
2022-06-09 11:13               ` Joakim Petersen
2022-06-09 18:29                 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-06-11  9:01                   ` SZEDER Gábor
2022-06-09 11:44             ` [PATCH v8] git-prompt: make colouring consistent Joakim Petersen
2022-06-09 20:44             ` [PATCH] git-prompt: fix expansion of branch colour codes Joakim Petersen
2022-06-10  0:05               ` Junio C Hamano
2022-06-10  0:33                 ` Joakim Petersen
2022-06-10  0:47               ` [PATCH v2] " Joakim Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGTqyRxS9aBitVivSTqojX_C_VBdgrD7JkUKgKSE6apjabzvQg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=justinrdonnelly@gmail.com \
    --cc=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=joak-pet@online.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).