From: Hilco Wijbenga <hilco.wijbenga@gmail.com>
To: Alex Hoffman <spec@gal.ro>
Cc: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>, Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>,
Git Users <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Git bisect does not find commit introducing the bug
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 14:36:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAE1pOi0rsY1eCS25fFsSiCZoKxfCJHfaxcauKd_dDxnG8u6DhA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMX8fZW2y+iPRfSbXVcHufbM+CsqgekS_0WnCEJ++=njy_TvKg@mail.gmail.com>
On 18 February 2017 at 10:36, Alex Hoffman <spec@gal.ro> wrote:
> You definitely convinced me that git MUST search more than only in the
> paths between good and bad commits, as the good commit G does not have
> to be the first good commit (thank you for that). My problem/confusion
> is that it returns something that does not make sense to me, because
> it does not make sure it returns a transition.
If multiple transitions from GOOD to BAD happen, then I don't see how
binary search is useful/possible. The same is true for a simple list
of numbers, say, 1 5 6 2 3 4. You can't use binary search here because
you can't "throw away" all numbers to the left (or right) of your
pivot. Or am I missing your point?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-18 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-17 22:29 Git bisect does not find commit introducing the bug Alex Hoffman
2017-02-17 23:21 ` Stephan Beyer
2017-02-18 9:12 ` Johannes Sixt
2017-02-18 11:15 ` Alex Hoffman
2017-02-18 14:18 ` Johannes Sixt
2017-02-18 18:36 ` Alex Hoffman
2017-02-18 19:58 ` Christian Couder
2017-02-19 11:32 ` Alex Hoffman
2017-02-19 12:43 ` Alex Hoffman
2017-02-19 13:07 ` Christian Couder
2017-02-19 14:13 ` Johannes Sixt
2017-02-19 19:05 ` Alex Hoffman
2017-02-19 19:25 ` Jacob Keller
2017-02-20 7:38 ` Oleg Taranenko
2017-02-20 12:27 ` Jakub Narębski
2017-02-20 13:50 ` Oleg Taranenko
2017-02-20 20:31 ` Alex Hoffman
2017-02-20 20:35 ` Jakub Narębski
2017-02-20 20:39 ` Alex Hoffman
2017-02-20 22:24 ` Philip Oakley
2017-02-21 19:40 ` Alex Hoffman
2017-02-21 22:39 ` Philip Oakley
2017-02-20 9:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-18 22:10 ` Philip Oakley
2017-02-18 22:36 ` Hilco Wijbenga [this message]
2017-02-18 22:37 ` Johannes Sixt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAE1pOi0rsY1eCS25fFsSiCZoKxfCJHfaxcauKd_dDxnG8u6DhA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=hilco.wijbenga@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=s-beyer@gmx.net \
--cc=spec@gal.ro \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).