From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6670E2018E for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 12:53:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935000AbcHEMxm (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2016 08:53:42 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:35164 "EHLO mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759617AbcHEMxl convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2016 08:53:41 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f66.google.com with SMTP id i5so3669170wmg.2 for ; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 05:53:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=NWbdZlOhzMuIi4FGxknKNmH1dw25amMgtJVptTrDidk=; b=P/zD9pMM0GL1W3KOeHVyqU5tgu6RMb4kRADstsDo+Bnri6njipemBxLmxsycD/3Dpe vBDo0EeWHNxuKIVlxoWKFrQoYv35kmVsjPvWYOV8urBMW6yC4eO0F7r1hGv/V9juJDpY +pt/E9q8qVJsVmXBDlMX7iUCWMdzt+V52wLMO3WlDgdkIx+elhBH5RfEhf3n121oAd/9 9Y3vc63IFfS4ZzR+0r2retOytQLmDXHDNTrtwrLEgAjIkIvqBluzrihzsn8XKemMGIE1 HpZtIvo1MfMa9ALYpYBKMB7i3yVGs4XrPMDzrzVZlCgSxNhLWHGde1CMW7uKACBOUpfj tH1Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=NWbdZlOhzMuIi4FGxknKNmH1dw25amMgtJVptTrDidk=; b=RQGLEnRDcZRRFWvbPU0Mj8Tcn385VciBjKK4CjXXSyqXMigGL0dE02BudL8FexeEU0 ksyrg6lFXTL1fWaDalO2VHIOkLs1nvvCukZbF5KVC2+0OUz9DstvMwdeM9HXU8Py2jMQ DRSS5J/4SB+LFwkF3lbDcmJ+J2L+wvB6eKUOcPWhx2j9DnMg6nX1cRadvHubACU2h10Z BzesVpi3R6wddD/Cz9NAYSMO6OMbakXD1a1oHEGwQ/3gAd0N3UiHRzDPvNn1TAttga5h EsvJCniBpZaAVOkPfC+J0OUygzEnkxqnL/71wuUk1EVP50rNhjLGfREzk0ss3nMYKHvy vLjg== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousWpL0PC4ZuxQLOyFtDfq7EfN09LjAATLE3LaY+s75OejIdMHK4C9DZbIFEozHM7A== X-Received: by 10.28.22.70 with SMTP id 67mr3538165wmw.52.1470401620519; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 05:53:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slxbook4.ads.autodesk.com ([62.159.156.210]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d8sm8554528wmi.0.2016.08.05.05.53.39 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Aug 2016 05:53:39 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/12] convert: add filter..process option From: Lars Schneider In-Reply-To: <20160803224619.bwtbvmslhuicx2qi@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:53:38 +0200 Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, jnareb@gmail.com, tboegi@web.de, mlbright@gmail.com, e@80x24.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: References: <20160729233801.82844-1-larsxschneider@gmail.com> <20160803164225.46355-1-larsxschneider@gmail.com> <20160803164225.46355-12-larsxschneider@gmail.com> <0E3FC781-1B2C-4341-9B7B-D9D836596A35@gmail.com> <20160803224619.bwtbvmslhuicx2qi@sigill.intra.peff.net> To: Jeff King X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org > On 04 Aug 2016, at 00:46, Jeff King wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 11:48:00PM +0200, Lars Schneider wrote: > >> OK. Is this the v2 discussion you are referring to? >> http://public-inbox.org/git/1461972887-22100-1-git-send-email-sbeller%40google.com/ >> >> What format do you suggest? >> >> packet: git< git-filter-protocol\n >> packet: git< version=2\n >> packet: git< capability=clean\n >> packet: git< capability=smudge\n >> packet: git< 0000 >> >> or >> >> packet: git< git-filter-protocol\n >> packet: git< version=2\n >> packet: git< capability\n >> packet: git< clean\n >> packet: git< smudge\n >> packet: git< 0000 >> >> or ... ? >> >> I would prefer the first one, I think. > > How about: > > version=2 > clean=true > smudge=true > 0000 > > ? Then we do not have to care about multiple "capability" keys (so > something naively parsing this could just store them in a string list, > for example). Alright. I will go with this solution. Thanks, Lars