From: demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: John Tapsell <johnflux@gmail.com>,
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>,
Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>,
Brendan Miller <catphive@catphive.net>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: obnoxious CLI complaints
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 01:19:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b18b3110909101619n6904a75dm10dd0b5717fb0d76@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7v4ora76vr.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
2009/9/11 Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>:
> John Tapsell <johnflux@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> 2009/9/10 Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>:
>>> Dnia czwartek 10. września 2009 21:46, John Tapsell napisał:
>>>> 2009/9/10 Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> > First, it would be consistent with how ordinary archivers such as tar
>>>> > or zip are used, where you have to specify list of files to archive
>>>> > (in our case this list is HEAD). Second, I'd rather not accidentally
>>>> > dump binary to terminal: "git archive [HEAD]" dumps archive to standard
>>>> > output.
>>>>
>>>> That could be fixed by outputting to a file. git format-patch outputs
>>>> to a file, so why wouldn't git achieve?
>>>
>>> "git format-patch" outputs to files because it generates _multiple_
>>> files; generating single patch is special case. Also git-format-patch
>>> can generate file names from patch (commit) subject; it is not the case
>>> for "git archive" (what name should it use?).
>>
>> What if it used the current (or topleve) directory name? Wouldn't
>> that work in most cases?
>
> Following along the same line of reasoning, it would work in most cases if
> the output is literally named "archive.tar". If it is not the name the
> user wants, the user can "mv" afterwards, or give an explicit filename.
Why not $sha1.tar?
> What it does _not_ allow is to send the output to a downstream command for
> postprocessing without introducing some magic token to say "standard
> output" (e.g. "git archive -f - | (cd ../foo && tar xf -)").
>
> If the default is to write to the standard output, we won't have all of
> these issues. People who want a file can name the file by
>
> git archive >my.file.tar
>
> and people who want to pipe (which is 99% of the use pattern for me) can
> say
>
> git archive | down stream commands.
>
> Oh, wait.
>
> That is exactly what we have, so what's the point of continuing this
> discussion any further? Can we just stop?
Is it portable to assume that piping is always in binmode? From a
portability POV i could imagine piping being a problem in this
respect, and might be why tar provides a way to output to a file and
not just to a handle. For example ISTR that on windows piping is by
default in text mode. I think its not a showstopper there as you can
change it, but still, from a portability point of view you might not
want to depend on piping.
cheers,
Yves
--
perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-10 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-09 21:27 obnoxious CLI complaints Brendan Miller
2009-09-09 21:54 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-09-09 22:06 ` Wincent Colaiuta
2009-09-10 16:50 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-09-10 18:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-09-10 22:19 ` René Scharfe
2009-09-11 3:15 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-09-10 19:46 ` John Tapsell
2009-09-10 20:17 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-09-10 20:23 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-09-10 22:04 ` John Tapsell
2009-09-10 22:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-09-10 23:19 ` demerphq [this message]
2009-09-11 0:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-09-11 0:18 ` John Tapsell
2009-09-11 0:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-09-10 0:09 ` Brendan Miller
2009-09-10 1:25 ` Todd Zullinger
2009-09-10 9:16 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-09-10 18:18 ` Eric Schaefer
2009-09-10 18:52 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-09-10 22:19 ` René Scharfe
2009-09-11 14:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-11 22:01 ` René Scharfe
2009-09-11 22:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-12 10:31 ` Dmitry Potapov
2009-09-12 18:32 ` John Tapsell
2009-09-12 21:44 ` Dmitry Potapov
2009-09-12 22:21 ` John Tapsell
2009-09-12 22:35 ` A Large Angry SCM
2009-09-12 22:43 ` Dmitry Potapov
2009-09-12 23:08 ` John Tapsell
2009-09-13 2:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-09-13 17:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] git-archive: add '-o' as a alias for '--output' Dmitry Potapov
2009-09-13 17:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] teach git-archive to auto detect the output format Dmitry Potapov
2009-09-13 18:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-09-13 20:17 ` [PATCH v2 " Dmitry Potapov
2009-09-13 21:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-09-13 18:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] git-archive: add '-o' as a alias for '--output' Junio C Hamano
2009-09-13 20:13 ` [PATCH v2 " Dmitry Potapov
2009-09-17 0:48 ` obnoxious CLI complaints Brendan Miller
2009-09-17 1:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-09-09 21:58 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-09-09 22:58 ` Pierre Habouzit
2009-09-10 1:32 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-09-10 18:54 ` Matthieu Moy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9b18b3110909101619n6904a75dm10dd0b5717fb0d76@mail.gmail.com \
--to=demerphq@gmail.com \
--cc=catphive@catphive.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=johnflux@gmail.com \
--cc=win@wincent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).