From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J.C. Pizarro" Subject: Re: [PATCH] gc --aggressive: make it really aggressive Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 20:07:20 +0100 Message-ID: <998d0e4a0712061107r47f99599m262ffc7aefc4938a@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Pierre Habouzit" , "Linus Torvalds" , "Daniel Berlin" , "David Miller" , ismail@pardus.org.tr, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com To: "David Kastrup" , "Johannes Schindelin" X-From: gcc-return-142760-gcc=m.gmane.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Dec 06 20:07:48 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcc@gmane.org Received: from sourceware.org ([209.132.176.174]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J0M4Z-0003go-94 for gcc@gmane.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 20:07:47 +0100 Received: (qmail 19411 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2007 19:07:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 19360 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Dec 2007 19:07:27 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 19:07:23 +0000 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 60so301336wri for ; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 11:07:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.29.7 with SMTP id c7mr112872wxc.1196968040789; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 11:07:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.54.17 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Dec 2007 11:07:20 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc@gcc.gnu.org Archived-At: On 2007/12/06, David Kastrup wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > > However, I think that --aggressive should be aggressive, and if you > > decide to run it on a machine which lacks the muscle to be aggressive, > > well, you should have known better. > > That's a rather cheap shot. "you should have known better" than > expecting to be able to use a documented command and option because the > git developers happened to have a nicer machine... > > _How_ is one supposed to have known better? > > -- > David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum In GIT, the --aggressive option doesn't make it aggressive. In GCC, the -Wall option doesn't enable all warnings. # It's a "Tie one to one" with the similar reputations. ####### To have a rest in peace. # # J.C.Pizarro #