From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7059A1FBF4 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 12:28:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751433AbdJ3M2L convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:28:11 -0400 Received: from marcos.anarc.at ([206.248.172.91]:42852 "EHLO marcos.anarc.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751166AbdJ3M2K (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:28:10 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: anarcat) with ESMTPSA id 75EEE1A00AA From: =?utf-8?Q?Antoine_Beaupr=C3=A9?= To: Matthieu Moy Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: future of the mediawiki extension? In-Reply-To: Organization: Debian References: <87vaix731f.fsf@curie.anarc.at> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:28:09 -0400 Message-ID: <87mv487rc6.fsf@curie.anarc.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 2017-10-30 11:29:55, Matthieu Moy wrote: >> It should also be mentioned that this contrib isn't very active: I'm not >> part of the GitHub organization, yet I'm probably the one that's been >> the most active with patches in the last year (and I wasn't very active >> at all). > > FYI, I'm no longer using Mediawiki as much as I did, and I don't really > use Git-Mediawiki anymore. > > The main blocking point to revive Git-Mediawiki is to find a new > maintainer (https://github.com/Git-Mediawiki/Git-Mediawiki/issues/33). I > believe I just found one ;-). Eh. I assume you mean me here. As I hinted at in another thread, I am not sure I can commit to leading the project - just scratching an itch. But I may be able to review pull requests and make some releases from time to time... I probably won't work on code or features I don't need unless someone funds my work or something. ;) We'll see where the community takes us, I guess... Always better to have more than one maintainer, anyways, just for the bus factor... Worst case, I'll delegate to a worthy successor. :) A. -- Votre silence ne vous protégera pas. - Audrey Lorde