From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D34C020281 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 02:10:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752692AbdJaCK1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2017 22:10:27 -0400 Received: from marcos.anarc.at ([206.248.172.91]:54438 "EHLO marcos.anarc.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751871AbdJaCK0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2017 22:10:26 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: anarcat) with ESMTPSA id DC1371A00AA From: =?utf-8?Q?Antoine_Beaupr=C3=A9?= To: Junio C Hamano , Matthieu Moy Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: future of the mediawiki extension? In-Reply-To: Organization: Debian References: <87vaix731f.fsf@curie.anarc.at> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 22:10:22 -0400 Message-ID: <874lqg83u9.fsf@curie.anarc.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 2017-10-31 10:37:29, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> There's also a hybrid solution used by git-multimail: have a copy of the >> code in git.git, but do the development separately. I'm not sure it'd be >> a good idea for Git-Mediawiki, but I'm mentionning it for completeness. > > I think the plan was to make code drop from time to time at major > release points of git-multimail, but I do not think we've seen many > updates recently. I'd be okay with a hybrid as well. It would require minimal work on Git's side at this stage: things can just stay as is until there's a new "release" of the mediawiki extension and at that point you can decide if you merge it all in or if you drop it in favor of the contrib. I think it's also fine to punt it completely out to the community. Either way, I may have time to do some of that work in the coming month, so let me know what you prefer, I guess you two have the last word here. The community, on Mediawiki's side, seem to mostly favor GitHub. A. -- Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity, but don't rule out malice. - Albert Einstein