From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Cc: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
git <git@vger.kernel.org>, Heba Waly <heba.waly@gmail.com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>,
Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>,
Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Possible idea for GSoC 2020
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 13:52:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <868sjw5wxp.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4c063495-0b01-dd0d-eb87-61e31a774cde@gmail.com> (Derrick Stolee's message of "Wed, 18 Mar 2020 11:25:42 -0400")
Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> writes:
> On 3/18/2020 9:55 AM, Jakub Narebski wrote:
>> I have added 'Generation number v2' as one of alternative ways of
>> working on the more generic "Commit graph labeling for speeding up git
>> commands" idea -- as first task, because it fit better the narrative:
>> https://github.com/git/git.github.io/commit/a6d59820709417081c334a5120342987ff046f1a
>>
>> Could you (or Stolee) check current proposal, so that it can be merged
>> in? Thanks in advance.
>>
>> https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/soc-2020-idea-jnareb/SoC-2020-Ideas.md
>
> Thanks for the updated write-up. I think the narrative is helpful, describing how
> we landed on the definition of "generation number v2" before going into the interval
> methods.
>
> The only comment I have is about this statement at the end, which seems to be a
> carry-over from your perspective of wanting intervals instead of v2:
>
> Before starting on this task, at the beginning of the GSoC, it might be
> [a (sic)] good idea to check that interval labels would provide significant
> performance improvements at least in some cases (and if it is not the case,
> switch to working on generation numbers v2).
>
> The final parenthetical (switch to working on...) is a bit presumptive. Instead,
> please recommend an exploration period to determine which methods have which
> performance improvements using prototypes and/or the Python notebook. I'm usually
> of the opinion that a prototype is more informative as it compares the results in
> context, and the student would learn about the code that needs to change before
> creating review-quality patches.
Thanks, I took it into account in the final version
https://git.github.io/SoC-2020-Ideas/
Best,
--
Jakub Narębski
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-19 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-10 14:50 [RFC] Possible idea for GSoC 2020 Jakub Narebski
2020-03-11 19:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-03-13 10:56 ` Jakub Narebski
2020-03-15 14:26 ` Jakub Narebski
2020-03-17 12:24 ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2020-03-17 12:39 ` Kaartic Sivaraam
2020-03-17 14:22 ` Jakub Narebski
2020-03-11 20:29 ` Christian Couder
2020-03-11 21:30 ` Jakub Narebski
2020-03-11 21:48 ` Christian Couder
2020-03-12 12:17 ` Jakub Narebski
2020-03-12 13:08 ` Jakub Narebski
2020-03-13 10:59 ` Jakub Narebski
2020-03-13 13:08 ` Philip Oakley
2020-03-13 14:34 ` Jakub Narebski
2020-03-15 18:57 ` Philip Oakley
2020-03-15 21:14 ` Jakub Narebski
2020-03-16 14:47 ` Philip Oakley
2020-03-16 12:44 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-03-17 3:13 ` Jakub Narebski
2020-03-17 7:24 ` Christian Couder
2020-03-17 11:49 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-03-17 14:18 ` Jakub Narebski
2020-03-17 17:04 ` Christian Couder
2020-03-18 13:55 ` Jakub Narebski
2020-03-18 15:25 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-03-19 12:52 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-03-13 17:30 Abhishek Kumar
2020-03-17 17:00 Abhishek Kumar
2020-03-17 18:05 ` Jakub Narebski
2020-03-17 18:00 Abhishek Kumar
2020-03-19 12:50 ` Jakub Narebski
[not found] <CAHk66ftQqFqP-4kd4-8cHtCMEofSUvbeSQ24pcCCrkz7+2JG1w@mail.gmail.com>
2020-03-27 18:31 ` Jakub Narębski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=868sjw5wxp.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=emilyshaffer@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=heba.waly@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).