From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ivan Chernyavsky Subject: Re: Which branch(es) contain certain commits? (was Re: (unknown)) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:45:58 +0300 Message-ID: <85421439793958@web4j.yandex.ru> References: <349031438778845@web22j.yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Git Mailing List To: Duy Nguyen X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Aug 17 08:46:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZREBN-0005eR-GL for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 08:46:09 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750862AbbHQGqD (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:46:03 -0400 Received: from forward11j.cmail.yandex.net ([5.255.227.175]:41474 "EHLO forward11j.cmail.yandex.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750774AbbHQGqC (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:46:02 -0400 Received: from web4j.yandex.ru (web4j.yandex.ru [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1619::304]) by forward11j.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id B621B21C67; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:45:59 +0300 (MSK) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by web4j.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id F3A803009B5; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:45:58 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1439793959; bh=JDDfro36IjiTYwIWaLG3AV2/O+7Vo94XV2+tZC26bGE=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date; b=uA6xyQ7d/NKvKZ0Xvetlh8/780t99cQofu9PJQDgMPLMyixUMjkl6/spQ6PG2rAAc ph7E6hsMtp4EheNgpOiTh31djNcuBYHRLWXZfkAmjSE7hdHZRGgzp2IeWmgiHUwk26 c6J2ZkUgLGIHtrJSN8A7otBvcfYHV/+6FGBjSMiM= Received: by web4j.yandex.ru with HTTP; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:45:58 +0300 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: 15.08.2015, 12:19, "Duy Nguyen" : > > Probably because nobody is interested and steps up to do it. The lack > of response to you mail is a sign. Maybe you can try make a patch? I > imagine it would not be so different from current --contains code, but > this time we need to look into commits, not just commit id. > Yeah thanks much, I'll try. Actually that was my original intention, I just wanted to have some "reasonability check" for my idea. -- Ivan