git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bug in "git fsck"?
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2021 22:03:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52847a99-db7c-9634-b3b1-fd9b1342bc32@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqczs0popg.fsf@gitster.g>

Am 02.07.21 um 20:15 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> "Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> writes:
>
>> I was wondering whether git fsck should be able to cleanup
>> orphaned branches ("HEAD points to an unborn branch") as described
>> in https://stackoverflow.com/q/68226081/6607497 It seems I can fix
>> it be editing files in the repository, but I feed that's not the
>> way it should be.
>
> HEAD pointing at an unborn branch is not even a corruption, isn't
> it?
>
>    $ rm -rf trash && git init trash
>
> would point HEAD at an unborn one, ready to be used.

True, but the scenario described on StackOverflow is a bit different.
Commits were filtered out, and branches still pointing to them cannot
be deleted with "git branch -d" or "git branch -D".  Git fsck only
reports them.

You *can* overwrite them using "git branch --force foo" and then
"git branch -d foo" works.

I think it makes sense to let "git branch -D foo" work directly in such
a case.  That would be a user-visible change that may cause data loss,
so we better be careful.  I can't imagine a practical data-loss
scenario, but that might be just me.  Under which circumstances do we
want to keep a branch that does not point to a commit?

Anyway, here's what the change would look like:

--- >8 ---
Subject: [PATCH] branch: allow deleting dangling branches with --force

git branch only allows deleting branches that point to valid commits.
Skip that check if --force is given, as the caller is indicating with
it that they know what they are doing and accept the consequences.
This allows deleting dangling branches, which previously had to be
reset to a valid start-point using --force first.

Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
---
 Documentation/git-branch.txt | 3 ++-
 builtin/branch.c             | 2 +-
 t/t3200-branch.sh            | 7 +++++++
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/git-branch.txt b/Documentation/git-branch.txt
index 94dc9a54f2..5449767121 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-branch.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-branch.txt
@@ -118,7 +118,8 @@ OPTIONS
 	Reset <branchname> to <startpoint>, even if <branchname> exists
 	already. Without `-f`, 'git branch' refuses to change an existing branch.
 	In combination with `-d` (or `--delete`), allow deleting the
-	branch irrespective of its merged status. In combination with
+	branch irrespective of its merged status, or whether it even
+	points to a valid commit. In combination with
 	`-m` (or `--move`), allow renaming the branch even if the new
 	branch name already exists, the same applies for `-c` (or `--copy`).

diff --git a/builtin/branch.c b/builtin/branch.c
index b23b1d1752..03c7b7253a 100644
--- a/builtin/branch.c
+++ b/builtin/branch.c
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static int check_branch_commit(const char *branchname, const char *refname,
 			       int kinds, int force)
 {
 	struct commit *rev = lookup_commit_reference(the_repository, oid);
-	if (!rev) {
+	if (!force && !rev) {
 		error(_("Couldn't look up commit object for '%s'"), refname);
 		return -1;
 	}
diff --git a/t/t3200-branch.sh b/t/t3200-branch.sh
index cc4b10236e..ec61a10c29 100755
--- a/t/t3200-branch.sh
+++ b/t/t3200-branch.sh
@@ -1272,6 +1272,13 @@ test_expect_success 'attempt to delete a branch merged to its base' '
 	test_must_fail git branch -d my10
 '

+test_expect_success 'branch --delete --force removes dangling branch' '
+	test_when_finished "rm -f .git/refs/heads/dangling" &&
+	echo $ZERO_OID >.git/refs/heads/dangling &&
+	git branch --delete --force dangling &&
+	test_path_is_missing .git/refs/heads/dangling
+'
+
 test_expect_success 'use --edit-description' '
 	write_script editor <<-\EOF &&
 		echo "New contents" >"$1"
--
2.32.0

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-03 20:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-02 14:01 bug in "git fsck"? Ulrich Windl
2021-07-02 18:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-03 20:03   ` René Scharfe [this message]
2021-07-05  7:42     ` Antw: [EXT] " Ulrich Windl
2021-07-05 14:44       ` René Scharfe
2021-07-06  7:12         ` Ulrich Windl
2021-07-06 14:25           ` René Scharfe
2021-07-08  8:20             ` Ulrich Windl
2021-07-08 16:36               ` René Scharfe
2021-07-05 19:52     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-05  7:10   ` Antw: [EXT] " Ulrich Windl
2021-07-05  7:26     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-07-05  7:20   ` Ulrich Windl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52847a99-db7c-9634-b3b1-fd9b1342bc32@web.de \
    --to=l.s.r@web.de \
    --cc=Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).