From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01D31F8C1 for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 20:42:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726533AbgEGUmF (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2020 16:42:05 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:40920 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1726093AbgEGUmE (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2020 16:42:04 -0400 Received: (qmail 2621 invoked by uid 109); 7 May 2020 20:42:06 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with SMTP; Thu, 07 May 2020 20:42:06 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 21848 invoked by uid 111); 7 May 2020 20:42:09 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 07 May 2020 16:42:09 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 16:42:04 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Taylor Blau Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, dstolee@microsoft.com, gitster@pobox.com, szeder.dev@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] commit-graph: drop CHECK_OIDS, peel in callers Message-ID: <20200507204204.GF29683@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 06:07:09PM -0600, Taylor Blau wrote: > Here's a small re-roll of my series to move peeling outside of the > commit-graph internals, and drop the CHECK_OIDS flag. This re-roll was > promised in [1], and only updates the messages used in the new progress > meters. For convenience, a range-diff from v1 is included below. I just reviewed v1. :) But I think the revised progress messages in v2 are much better. The overall direction looks very good to me. I left a couple of comments. Nothing too major, but I think there are some things worth addressing (leaks, and more robust error checking in the final patch). -Peff