From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069A51F8C1 for ; Mon, 4 May 2020 23:36:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728278AbgEDXgg (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2020 19:36:36 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:36924 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1727982AbgEDXgf (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2020 19:36:35 -0400 Received: (qmail 3644 invoked by uid 109); 4 May 2020 23:36:35 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with SMTP; Mon, 04 May 2020 23:36:35 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 23650 invoked by uid 111); 4 May 2020 23:36:36 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 04 May 2020 19:36:36 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 19:36:34 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Taylor Blau Cc: =?utf-8?B?xJBvw6BuIFRy4bqnbiBDw7RuZw==?= Danh , git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Hostetler , Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] CI: limit GitHub Actions to designated branches Message-ID: <20200504233634.GB39798@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20200504150105.GB11373@coredump.intra.peff.net> <73de97dfebfccabe9f1bf32ea41aea5008a949cd.1588607262.git.congdanhqx@gmail.com> <20200504162311.GE12842@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20200504215824.GC45250@syl.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200504215824.GC45250@syl.local> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 03:58:24PM -0600, Taylor Blau wrote: > Huh; I'm not sure that I'm sold on the idea of a 'for-ci' namespace > here. In addition to running 'make test' on patches locally before I > send them, I find it tremendously convenient for GitHub to run them for > me when I push 'tb/' branches up to 'ttaylorr/git'. > > So, while the above is more-or-less what I'd expect the monitored list > of branches to look like (at least, ignoring the missing 'for-ci/**' > bits), I wish that I could also build every branch that I push up to my > fork. > > Of course, I don't want to maintain a one-patch difference between > ttaylorr/git@master and git/git@master, so I wonder if we could get a > little more creative with these rules and actually run Actions on > *every* branch, but introduce a new first step which stops the rest of > the actions run (so that in practice we're not running CI on > non-integration branches in Junio's tree). I don't understand what that would accomplish. If we ran the actions on every branch but stopped the run, then you wouldn't get the CI results you want. What am I missing? -Peff