git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fast-import's hash table is slow
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 06:35:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200401103522.GE60227@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fcf422e4-08f6-634a-39ba-18d40d1c25ca@web.de>

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 09:14:58PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:

> > nr_objects   master       patch
> > 2^20         0m04.317s    0m5.109s
> > 2^21         0m10.204s    0m9.702s
> > 2^22         0m27.159s    0m17.911s
> > 2^23         1m19.038s    0m35.080s
> > 2^24         4m18.766s    1m10.233s
> 
> I get similar numbers.
> 
> Pre-sizing by putting this near the top of cmd_main() gets the time
> for 1M down to 4 seconds:
> 
> 	kh_resize_object_entry_set(&object_table, 1 << 18);
> 
> The more fair 1 << 16 does not cut it, the totally unfair 1 << 20 gives
> a small extra boost.

Good call. I can reproduce those results, too ("1 << 20" gives me a 12%
overall speedup). I'm surprised the growth isn't aggressive enough for
this early expansion to get lost in the noise.

> > +	/*
> > +	 * this cast works because we only look at the oid part of the entry,
> > +	 * and it comes first in the struct
> > +	 */
> > +	khiter_t pos = kh_get_object_entry_set(&object_table,
> > +					       (struct object_entry *)oid);
> 
> Dirty, but I can believe the comment.

Our hashmap.c implementation gets around this by letting the equality
function take an extra parameter. It's annoying when you're writing
those functions, but it should allow this case without any casting (or
preemptively allocating a struct).

> > -	for (h = 0; h < ARRAY_SIZE(object_table); h++) {
> > -		struct object_entry *e;
> > -
> > -		for (e = object_table[h]; e; e = e->next)
> > +	for (iter = kh_begin(&object_table); iter != kh_end(&object_table); iter++) {
> > +		if (kh_exist(&object_table, iter)) {
> > +			struct object_entry *e = kh_key(&object_table, iter);
> >  			if (e->pack_id == id)
> >  				e->pack_id = MAX_PACK_ID;
> > +		}
> >  	}
> 
> Is this really the best way to handle that, independently of the hashmap
> that's used?  I wonder how an extra hashmap or set of valid pack_id
> values (or set of invalidated pack_id values?) would fare against having
> to touch all object entries here.

I think the invalidation is pretty infrequent. It only gets called by
end_packfile() when there are few enough objects to loosen them. So
usually that would only happen once per process. You can also trigger it
manually with a "checkpoint" command, but if you're checkpointing often
enough to dump loose objects, I suspect you have other performance
problems.

-Peff

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-01 10:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-31  9:45 fast-import's hash table is slow Jeff King
2020-03-31 19:14 ` René Scharfe
2020-03-31 23:21   ` René Scharfe
2020-04-01 10:24     ` Jeff King
2020-04-02 18:40       ` René Scharfe
2020-04-03 12:14         ` Jeff King
2020-04-01 10:35   ` Jeff King [this message]
2020-04-01 11:16     ` Jeff King
2020-04-02 18:40       ` René Scharfe
2020-04-03 12:12         ` Jeff King
2020-04-03 18:53           ` René Scharfe
2020-04-03 19:01             ` Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200401103522.GE60227@coredump.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=l.s.r@web.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).