From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FSL_HELO_FAKE, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC881F4B5 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 20:40:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727104AbfKSUkT (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Nov 2019 15:40:19 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f194.google.com ([209.85.210.194]:46271 "EHLO mail-pf1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726711AbfKSUkT (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Nov 2019 15:40:19 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-f194.google.com with SMTP id 193so12820880pfc.13 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 12:40:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=X1v39SgS+eUkGDwBoFtmWCO/6sNIZVY0zFBG0Fbr8mw=; b=GG7PNpOzJc7j+KrV8cFpNSEg2WifInyZOXgUQwLu53Xl5d0KTtN9+WXIuMofzmk4Ts LtDBBTr/B3Doc38AFlwF3/diS6ioSGAxYskvxH5g8WUKgyQIFNZMnEtSrLJh7zBfQpVQ SAWeiVHLAHjkEY+Ht3p9oQNT9bD0DYz0Ba94o4UGV4Vl8C5r4HWn1wYXGa7X/pKdH+zk 7qFUfjsbW2YUwk3VDd/vv0NKPVlbH9Xnw/caifWC7rqekBG1MfdvyMvTl6PXGZ0231mW kHBh7jMV6ZSMj/jcPYxla328DMT8aAfr4ye2BsE+ggLO3VUzxPASETyBxt+MfqIniWks 2OSQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=X1v39SgS+eUkGDwBoFtmWCO/6sNIZVY0zFBG0Fbr8mw=; b=dqIIPu5YyqkFsTn5JFibGC3A9ZQOT3+i0PnokuJjvfjztUURUzNMrDQr7q6jiSzbiC R8QC4GUTPf0XQ0WrEJSoPrS3h3aikvkXcrK2P2pIn21cwafOzXIzHxSpUS3FlxLeYy7q JlwKBX3sgWGyiiEwHfzCzVs7P0XiG1K+wTbUmHXm2L7xbjH5hRL7mFIqdaa220/D3VwQ 92oX78Ky+vGHvJjdB3W8yZfgAhfXcbPnEAIsp6agQEviU7rirU+OD0RuPiiO96iGxGI7 I7GpyABw62Ik527UdLLec26MeTaFYHJY2pFAXod3hRxSmr2R/R+A67Dr5Z5f4zz9AnMp UXqw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXwfPbLe65U90MtTv5pPoxL7+jrD8OrrGgDwXX089haSucZLY/j J5cmmK7i2HjtPtcxRKueMDAUvg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwpyhNmShzdIs4az5NUM4WhxZeV7f5nx+QUO/KugiiVQ3kkkLXSQ9lcHHs+mmI6TUtKXri+lA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:4a01:: with SMTP id x1mr2575256pga.312.1574196018335; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 12:40:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:2ce:0:231c:11cc:aa0a:6dc5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r203sm24469489pfr.184.2019.11.19.12.40.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 19 Nov 2019 12:40:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 12:40:13 -0800 From: Emily Shaffer To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 9/9] bugreport: print contents of alternates file Message-ID: <20191119204013.GC36377@google.com> References: <20191025025129.250049-1-emilyshaffer@google.com> <20191025025129.250049-10-emilyshaffer@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 04:57:01PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi Emily, > > On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Emily Shaffer wrote: > > > In some cases, it could be that the user is having a problem with an > > object which isn't present in their normal object directory. We can get > > a hint that that might be the case by examining the list of alternates > > where their object may be stored instead. > > Doesn't this open the possibility of leaking project's (possibly NDA'ed) names? > > I could imagine that we might rather want to count the alternates, and > maybe separate into those alternates that actually exist and alternates > that do not exist (which would produce a warning that the user might > have trained themselves to ignore). Sounds reasonable. Will do. - Emily