git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 21/23] fsck: accept an oid instead of a "struct tag" for fsck_tag()
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 01:01:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191018050125.GU17879@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191018044103.GA17625@sigill.intra.peff.net>

We don't actually look at the tag struct in fsck_tag() beyond its oid
and type (which is obviously OBJ_TAG). Just taking an oid gives our
callers more flexibility to avoid creating or parsing a struct, and
makes it clear that we are fscking just what is in the buffer, not any
pre-parsed bits from the struct.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
---
 fsck.c | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fsck.c b/fsck.c
index 42e7d1f71f..38be501278 100644
--- a/fsck.c
+++ b/fsck.c
@@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ static int fsck_commit(struct commit *commit, const char *buffer,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int fsck_tag(struct tag *tag, const char *buffer,
+static int fsck_tag(const struct object_id *oid, const char *buffer,
 		    unsigned long size, struct fsck_options *options)
 {
 	struct object_id tagged_oid;
@@ -829,48 +829,48 @@ static int fsck_tag(struct tag *tag, const char *buffer,
 	struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
 	const char *p;
 
-	ret = verify_headers(buffer, size, &tag->object.oid, tag->object.type, options);
+	ret = verify_headers(buffer, size, oid, OBJ_TAG, options);
 	if (ret)
 		goto done;
 
 	if (!skip_prefix(buffer, "object ", &buffer)) {
-		ret = report(options, &tag->object.oid, tag->object.type, FSCK_MSG_MISSING_OBJECT, "invalid format - expected 'object' line");
+		ret = report(options, oid, OBJ_TAG, FSCK_MSG_MISSING_OBJECT, "invalid format - expected 'object' line");
 		goto done;
 	}
 	if (parse_oid_hex(buffer, &tagged_oid, &p) || *p != '\n') {
-		ret = report(options, &tag->object.oid, tag->object.type, FSCK_MSG_BAD_OBJECT_SHA1, "invalid 'object' line format - bad sha1");
+		ret = report(options, oid, OBJ_TAG, FSCK_MSG_BAD_OBJECT_SHA1, "invalid 'object' line format - bad sha1");
 		if (ret)
 			goto done;
 	}
 	buffer = p + 1;
 
 	if (!skip_prefix(buffer, "type ", &buffer)) {
-		ret = report(options, &tag->object.oid, tag->object.type, FSCK_MSG_MISSING_TYPE_ENTRY, "invalid format - expected 'type' line");
+		ret = report(options, oid, OBJ_TAG, FSCK_MSG_MISSING_TYPE_ENTRY, "invalid format - expected 'type' line");
 		goto done;
 	}
 	eol = strchr(buffer, '\n');
 	if (!eol) {
-		ret = report(options, &tag->object.oid, tag->object.type, FSCK_MSG_MISSING_TYPE, "invalid format - unexpected end after 'type' line");
+		ret = report(options, oid, OBJ_TAG, FSCK_MSG_MISSING_TYPE, "invalid format - unexpected end after 'type' line");
 		goto done;
 	}
 	if (type_from_string_gently(buffer, eol - buffer, 1) < 0)
-		ret = report(options, &tag->object.oid, tag->object.type, FSCK_MSG_BAD_TYPE, "invalid 'type' value");
+		ret = report(options, oid, OBJ_TAG, FSCK_MSG_BAD_TYPE, "invalid 'type' value");
 	if (ret)
 		goto done;
 	buffer = eol + 1;
 
 	if (!skip_prefix(buffer, "tag ", &buffer)) {
-		ret = report(options, &tag->object.oid, tag->object.type, FSCK_MSG_MISSING_TAG_ENTRY, "invalid format - expected 'tag' line");
+		ret = report(options, oid, OBJ_TAG, FSCK_MSG_MISSING_TAG_ENTRY, "invalid format - expected 'tag' line");
 		goto done;
 	}
 	eol = strchr(buffer, '\n');
 	if (!eol) {
-		ret = report(options, &tag->object.oid, tag->object.type, FSCK_MSG_MISSING_TAG, "invalid format - unexpected end after 'type' line");
+		ret = report(options, oid, OBJ_TAG, FSCK_MSG_MISSING_TAG, "invalid format - unexpected end after 'type' line");
 		goto done;
 	}
 	strbuf_addf(&sb, "refs/tags/%.*s", (int)(eol - buffer), buffer);
 	if (check_refname_format(sb.buf, 0)) {
-		ret = report(options, &tag->object.oid, tag->object.type,
+		ret = report(options, oid, OBJ_TAG,
 			     FSCK_MSG_BAD_TAG_NAME,
 			     "invalid 'tag' name: %.*s",
 			     (int)(eol - buffer), buffer);
@@ -881,12 +881,12 @@ static int fsck_tag(struct tag *tag, const char *buffer,
 
 	if (!skip_prefix(buffer, "tagger ", &buffer)) {
 		/* early tags do not contain 'tagger' lines; warn only */
-		ret = report(options, &tag->object.oid, tag->object.type, FSCK_MSG_MISSING_TAGGER_ENTRY, "invalid format - expected 'tagger' line");
+		ret = report(options, oid, OBJ_TAG, FSCK_MSG_MISSING_TAGGER_ENTRY, "invalid format - expected 'tagger' line");
 		if (ret)
 			goto done;
 	}
 	else
-		ret = fsck_ident(&buffer, &tag->object.oid, tag->object.type, options);
+		ret = fsck_ident(&buffer, oid, OBJ_TAG, options);
 
 done:
 	strbuf_release(&sb);
@@ -987,8 +987,7 @@ int fsck_object(struct object *obj, void *data, unsigned long size,
 		return fsck_commit((struct commit *) obj, (const char *) data,
 			size, options);
 	if (obj->type == OBJ_TAG)
-		return fsck_tag((struct tag *) obj, (const char *) data,
-			size, options);
+		return fsck_tag(&obj->oid, data, size, options);
 
 	return report(options, &obj->oid, obj->type,
 		      FSCK_MSG_UNKNOWN_TYPE,
-- 
2.23.0.1228.gee29b05929


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-18  5:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-18  4:41 [PATCH 0/23] parsing and fsck cleanups Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:42 ` [PATCH 01/23] parse_commit_buffer(): treat lookup_commit() failure as parse error Jeff King
2019-10-24  3:37   ` Junio C Hamano
2019-10-24 18:01     ` Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:43 ` [PATCH 02/23] parse_commit_buffer(): treat lookup_tree() " Jeff King
2019-10-24 23:12   ` Jonathan Tan
2019-10-24 23:22     ` Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:45 ` [PATCH 03/23] parse_tag_buffer(): treat NULL tag pointer " Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:47 ` [PATCH 04/23] remember commit/tag parse failures Jeff King
2019-10-24  3:51   ` Junio C Hamano
2019-10-24 23:25   ` Jonathan Tan
2019-10-24 23:41     ` Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:48 ` [PATCH 05/23] fsck: stop checking commit->tree value Jeff King
2019-10-24  3:57   ` Junio C Hamano
2019-10-18  4:49 ` [PATCH 06/23] fsck: stop checking commit->parent counts Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:51 ` [PATCH 07/23] fsck: stop checking tag->tagged Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:54 ` [PATCH 08/23] fsck: require an actual buffer for non-blobs Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:56 ` [PATCH 09/23] fsck: unify object-name code Jeff King
2019-10-24  6:05   ` Junio C Hamano
2019-10-24 18:07     ` Jeff King
2019-10-25  3:23       ` Junio C Hamano
2019-10-25 21:20         ` Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:56 ` [PATCH 10/23] fsck_describe_object(): build on our get_object_name() primitive Jeff King
2019-10-24  6:06   ` Junio C Hamano
2019-10-18  4:57 ` [PATCH 11/23] fsck: use oids rather than objects for object_name API Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:58 ` [PATCH 12/23] fsck: don't require object structs for display functions Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:58 ` [PATCH 13/23] fsck: only provide oid/type in fsck_error callback Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:58 ` [PATCH 14/23] fsck: only require an oid for skiplist functions Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:59 ` [PATCH 15/23] fsck: don't require an object struct for report() Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:59 ` [PATCH 16/23] fsck: accept an oid instead of a "struct blob" for fsck_blob() Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:59 ` [PATCH 17/23] fsck: drop blob struct from fsck_finish() Jeff King
2019-10-18  5:00 ` [PATCH 18/23] fsck: don't require an object struct for fsck_ident() Jeff King
2019-10-18  5:00 ` [PATCH 19/23] fsck: don't require an object struct in verify_headers() Jeff King
2019-10-18  5:00 ` [PATCH 20/23] fsck: rename vague "oid" local variables Jeff King
2019-10-18  5:01 ` Jeff King [this message]
2019-10-18  5:01 ` [PATCH 22/23] fsck: accept an oid instead of a "struct commit" for fsck_commit() Jeff King
2019-10-18  5:02 ` [PATCH 23/23] fsck: accept an oid instead of a "struct tree" for fsck_tree() Jeff King
2019-10-24 23:49 ` [PATCH 0/23] parsing and fsck cleanups Jonathan Tan
2019-10-25  3:11 ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191018050125.GU17879@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).