From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3DDD1F453 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 04:10:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726858AbeJDLBh (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2018 07:01:37 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:40994 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1726730AbeJDLBh (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2018 07:01:37 -0400 Received: (qmail 28832 invoked by uid 109); 4 Oct 2018 04:10:21 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with SMTP; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 04:10:21 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 21405 invoked by uid 111); 4 Oct 2018 04:09:40 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) SMTP; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:09:40 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:10:18 -0400 Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 00:10:18 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Jonathan Nieder Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] drop vcs-svn experiment Message-ID: <20181004041018.GA1526@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20180817190310.GA5360@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20180818052605.GA241538@aiede.svl.corp.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180818052605.GA241538@aiede.svl.corp.google.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 10:26:05PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > Of course, I could be completely wrong about people using this. Maybe > > svn-fe builds are just completely broken on my system, and maybe people > > really do use testsvn::. But if so, they certainly aren't talking about > > it on the mailing list. :) > > My take: > > - svn-fe works fine and has been useful to me, though its Makefile > could likely be simplified and made more user-friendly > > - I've benefited from the test coverage of having this in-tree > > - testsvn:: is a demo and at a minimum we ought not to install it > with "make install" > > - keeping this in-tree for the benefit of just one user is excessive, > so removing it is probably the right thing > > - it would be nice if the commit removing this code from Git includes > a note to help people find its new home > > Would you mind holding off until I'm able to arrange that last bit? Any further thoughts / movement on this? Not urgent, but I saw you mention it in another thread, and it's on my "to be decided" pile. -Peff