From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823B62022D for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 04:18:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751246AbdBXESQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 23:18:16 -0500 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:33168 "EHLO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751190AbdBXESO (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 23:18:14 -0500 Received: (qmail 14471 invoked by uid 109); 24 Feb 2017 04:18:10 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 04:18:10 +0000 Received: (qmail 11069 invoked by uid 111); 24 Feb 2017 04:18:13 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 23:18:13 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 23:18:07 -0500 Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 23:18:07 -0500 From: Jeff King To: Junio C Hamano Cc: bs.x.ttp@recursor.net, git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ident: do not ignore empty config name/email Message-ID: <20170224041807.5g3yogfnsoqegqkl@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20170223081157.hwfn3msfux5udmng@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20170223081708.ge34zjkmpsolocqx@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20170224010823.my4wmdyezjuqajfx@sigill.intra.peff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 08:11:11PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > So I dunno. I could really go either way on it. Feel free to drop it, or > > even move it into a separate topic to be cooked longer. > > If it were 5 years ago, it would have been different, but I do not > think cooking it longer in 'next' would smoke out breakages in > obscure scripts any longer. Git is used by too many people who have > never seen its source these days. Yeah, I have noticed that, too. I wonder if it would be interesting to cut "weeklies" or something of "master" or even "next" that people could install with a single click. Of course it's not like we have a binary installer in the first place, so I guess that's a prerequisite. -Peff