From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246D41FEB3 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 19:45:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S967305AbdAFTpA (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:45:00 -0500 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:36141 "EHLO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754983AbdAFTo7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:44:59 -0500 Received: (qmail 11051 invoked by uid 109); 6 Jan 2017 19:44:59 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 19:44:59 +0000 Received: (qmail 19628 invoked by uid 111); 6 Jan 2017 19:45:49 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 14:45:49 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 06 Jan 2017 14:44:57 -0500 Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:44:57 -0500 From: Jeff King To: Michael Haggerty Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, David Turner , Jacob Keller , Philip Oakley Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/23] Delete directories left empty after ref deletion Message-ID: <20170106194457.3qbhggpo6yox34al@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 05:22:20PM +0100, Michael Haggerty wrote: > This is v4 of this patch series. Thanks to Peff, Junio, Jake, and > Philip for their feedback about v3. I believe I have addressed all of > the comments about v1 [1], v2 [2], and v3 [3]. This version looks good to me. -Peff