From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6229C2098B for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:38:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S945206AbcJSPij (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:38:39 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:59452 "EHLO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S945190AbcJSPia (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:38:30 -0400 Received: (qmail 7357 invoked by uid 109); 19 Oct 2016 09:23:28 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 09:23:28 +0000 Received: (qmail 11949 invoked by uid 111); 19 Oct 2016 09:23:50 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 05:23:50 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 19 Oct 2016 05:23:27 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 05:23:27 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Santiago Torres , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2016, #03; Tue, 11) Message-ID: <20161019092326.lcuwe5hxwjf4ndpx@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20161018133518.hwbv3gbeddjjfvcz@LykOS.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 08:53:44AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> * st/verify-tag (2016-10-10) 7 commits > [...] > > Hi, I saw this on the previous "what's cooking." Is there anything I > > need to do on my side to make sure this is ready for next? > > Posting this exact message to the list would be an excellent way > ;-). > > Hopefully some competent reviewer comes and points me at a thread > where s/he says the series was already reviewed and in good shape > soonish, and your message may be a good trigger to make it happen. Another from my list of "things I have been meaning to review". :) I think this is close, but I had a few nits to pick with the ref-filter printing interface. I sent comments for each patch in the v4 thread. -Peff