From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B13420986 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 16:11:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753982AbcJDQLo (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2016 12:11:44 -0400 Received: from 216-12-86-13.cv.mvl.ntelos.net ([216.12.86.13]:55440 "EHLO brightrain.aerifal.cx" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752915AbcJDQLn (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2016 12:11:43 -0400 Received: from dalias by brightrain.aerifal.cx with local (Exim 3.15 #2) id 1brSJW-0002Gy-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 16:11:30 +0000 Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 12:11:30 -0400 From: Rich Felker To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org, musl@lists.openwall.com Subject: Re: Regression: git no longer works with musl libc's regex impl Message-ID: <20161004161130.GX19318@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20161004150848.GA7949@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20161004152722.ex2nox43oj5ak4yi@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20161004154045.GT19318@brightrain.aerifal.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 06:08:33PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi Rich, > > On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Rich Felker wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 11:27:22AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 11:08:48AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > > > > > > > 1. is nonzero mod page size, it just works; the remainder of the last > > > > page reads as zero bytes when mmapped. > > > > > > Is that a portable assumption? > > > > Yes. > > No, it is not. You quote POSIX, but the matter of the fact is that we use > a subset of POSIX in order to be able to keep things running on Windows. > > And quite honestly, there are lots of reasons to keep things running on > Windows, and even to favor Windows support over musl support. Over four > million reasons: the Git for Windows users. I would hope that in the future, git-for-windows users will be using musl, via midipix, rather than the painfully slow and awful version they're stuck with now... Rich