From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1880C2070F for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 23:55:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751561AbcISXzz (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:55:55 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:44919 "EHLO relay4-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751146AbcISXzy (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:55:54 -0400 Received: from cloud (joshtriplett.org [IPv6:2604:3400:dc1:41:216:3eff:fe9f:2070]) (Authenticated sender: josh@joshtriplett.org) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 64F34172094; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 01:55:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:55:50 -0700 From: Josh Triplett To: Jacob Keller Cc: Jeff King , Junio C Hamano , Andrew Donnellan , Git mailing list Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] format-patch: Add --rfc for the common case of [RFC PATCH] Message-ID: <20160919235550.GC29421@cloud> References: <3df15bbb-7eac-86ec-2ccb-74a973482e8c@au1.ibm.com> <20160919204408.GA28962@cloud> <20160919233434.fhkikksi4cxzrzb5@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160919234022.GA29421@cloud> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:46:06PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:34:35PM -0700, Jeff King wrote: > >> As far as your patch goes, I'd be OK with defining: > >> > >> --rfc:: > >> Pretend as if `--subject-prefix='RFC PATCH'` was given. > >> > > Would: > > Shorthand for `--subject-prefix='RFC PATCH'` > > be a better reading? I feel like using "pretend" is a bit weird here. My patch used "Alias for"; if you prefer "Shorthand for" I'm indifferent. :)