From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Cc: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com>,
Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
"git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/6] transport: add refspec list parameters to functions
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:11:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160427041138.GA22920@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ79kYGi9bhRfGype7te4cGkxvnKww269kYoykB+76HNnTarg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:59:22PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> > Maybe we can do a mix of 2 and 4:
> >
> > 1) HTTP grows more extensions; other protocols stagnate for now.
> > 2) Come up with a backwards-incompatible protocol v2, foccussed on
> > capabilities negotiation phase, hitting alternative end points
> > (non http only, or rather a subset of protocols only)
> > 3) if HTTP sees the benefits of the native protocol v2, we may switch
> > HTTP, too
> >
> > (in time order of execution. Each point is decoupled from the others and may
> > be done by different people at different times.)
> >
>
> Today I rebased protocol-v2[1] and it was fewer conflicts than expected.
> I am surprised by myself that there is even a test case for v2 already,
> so I think it is more progressed that I had in mind. Maybe we can do 1)
> for now and hope that the non http catches up eventually?
If the plan is something like:
1. v2 exists, but client/server don't know when they should use it.
2. smart-http grows an extra parameter for the client to say "hey, I
know v2"
3. Other protocols get some manual v2 support (e.g., client asks for
"upload-pack2" if instructed by the user, server either speaks v2
then or says "eh, what?").
I like that very much. It lets us "cheat" on the hard part of the
problem for http, which is what David's series is doing, but it provides
a clear path forward for the protocols eventually reaching feature
parity (namely that eventually all servers speak v2, and the client can
start asking for v2 by default).
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-27 4:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-15 19:19 [PATCH/RFC 0/6] fetch with refspec David Turner
2016-04-15 19:19 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/6] http-backend: use argv_array functions David Turner
2016-04-18 18:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-19 19:11 ` David Turner
2016-04-15 19:19 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/6] remote-curl.c: fix variable shadowing David Turner
2016-04-18 18:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-19 19:14 ` David Turner
2016-04-15 19:19 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/6] http-backend: handle refspec argument David Turner
2016-04-17 1:51 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-19 18:57 ` David Turner
2016-04-15 19:19 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/6] transport: add refspec list parameters to functions David Turner
2016-04-18 18:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-19 7:14 ` Jeff King
2016-04-19 18:04 ` Stefan Beller
2016-04-19 20:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-19 21:40 ` David Turner
2016-04-19 23:22 ` Jeff King
2016-04-19 23:43 ` David Turner
2016-04-20 1:17 ` Jeff King
2016-04-20 20:46 ` David Turner
2016-04-20 20:57 ` Jeff King
2016-04-25 16:44 ` David Turner
2016-04-25 22:10 ` Stefan Beller
2016-04-27 3:59 ` Stefan Beller
2016-04-27 4:11 ` Jeff King [this message]
2016-04-27 15:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-29 23:05 ` David Turner
2016-04-29 23:12 ` Stefan Beller
2016-04-19 19:31 ` David Turner
2016-04-15 19:19 ` [PATCH/RFC 5/6] fetch: pass refspec to http server David Turner
2016-04-17 2:33 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-19 21:25 ` David Turner
2016-04-15 19:19 ` [PATCH/RFC 6/6] clone: send refspec for single-branch clones David Turner
2016-04-17 2:36 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-19 21:24 ` David Turner
2016-04-15 19:30 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/6] fetch with refspec Stefan Beller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160427041138.GA22920@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=dturner@twopensource.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=sbeller@google.com \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).