From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 06/11] Makefile: split GIT_USER_AGENT from GIT-CFLAGS Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:16:16 -0400 Message-ID: <20120620221616.GC3302@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20120620182855.GA26948@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20120620183151.GF30995@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20120620212135.GE6142@burratino> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , Thomas Rast , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jonathan Nieder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jun 21 00:16:26 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ShTCJ-0002Kg-DY for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:16:23 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758192Ab2FTWQU (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:16:20 -0400 Received: from 99-108-225-23.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([99.108.225.23]:39350 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758184Ab2FTWQT (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:16:19 -0400 Received: (qmail 30972 invoked by uid 107); 20 Jun 2012 22:16:19 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:16:19 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:16:16 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120620212135.GE6142@burratino> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 04:21:35PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Jeff King wrote: > > > + @if test x'$(GIT_USER_AGENT_SQ)' != x"`cat GIT-USER-AGENT 2>/dev/null`"; then \ > > + echo >&2 " * new user-agent flag"; \ > > Micronit: the term "new user-agent string" would be clearer. Probably. I am tempted to get rid of the informative message altogether. For CFLAGS, you might be confused why everything is being rebuilt, since the dependency chain is not straightforward. For this, it's kind of obvious. > Re the lack of _HTTP: interesting. Is the plan to use this for > other protocols, too? Look at the jk/version-string topic that this is based on. :) -Peff