From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Li Subject: Re: Re: Merge with git-pasky II. Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 16:30:13 -0400 Message-ID: <20050414203013.GD25468@64m.dyndns.org> References: <7vfyxtsurd.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v64ypsqev.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vvf6pr4oq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20050414121624.GZ25711@pasky.ji.cz> <7vll7lqlbg.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20050414193507.GA22699@pasky.ji.cz> <7vmzs1osv1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20050414233159.GX22699@pasky.ji.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano , Linus Torvalds , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Apr 15 01:37:10 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DMDtK-0007co-6y for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 01:36:58 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261639AbVDNXkT (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2005 19:40:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261653AbVDNXkT (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2005 19:40:19 -0400 Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net ([216.148.227.85]:16118 "EHLO rwcrmhc12.comcast.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261639AbVDNXkP (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2005 19:40:15 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-24-6-236-77.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[24.6.236.77]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2005041423401401400hb8f0e>; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 23:40:14 +0000 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1027) id E5B9F3F1EF; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 16:30:13 -0400 (EDT) To: Petr Baudis Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050414233159.GX22699@pasky.ji.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:31:59AM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > > I am just trying to follow my understanding of what Linus > > wanted. One of the guiding principle is to do as much things as > > in dircache without ever checking things out or touching working > > files unnecessarily. > > I'm just arguing that instead of directly touching the directory cache, > you should just list what would you do there - and you already do this, That is exactly what I suggest in the previous email. And my python script does exactly that ;-) Chris