From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Cc: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>, git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: grep vs git grep performance?
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 10:22:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1509124942.1914.9.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ79kYWPunzZ2u=MtCoCadxXu_4etEK5DYnhYXo+CgeHrXQwQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 10:45 -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 09:58 -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> > > + Avar who knows a thing about pcre (I assume the regex compilation
> > > has impact on grep speed)
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> > > > Comparing a cache warm git grep vs command line grep
> > > > shows significant differences in cpu & wall clock.
> > > >
> > > > Any ideas how to improve this?
> > > >
> > > > $ time git grep "\bseq_.*%p\W" | wc -l
> > > > 112
> > > >
> > > > real 0m4.271s
> > > > user 0m15.520s
> > > > sys 0m0.395s
> > > >
> > > > $ time grep -r --include=*.[ch] "\bseq_.*%p\W" * | wc -l
> > > > 112
> > > >
> > > > real 0m1.164s
> > > > user 0m0.847s
> > > > sys 0m0.314s
> > > >
> > >
> > > I wonder how much is algorithmic advantage vs coding/micro
> > > optimization that we can do.
> >
> > As do I. I presume this is libpcre related.
> >
> > For instance, git grep performance is better than grep for:
> >
> > $ time git grep -w "seq_printf" -- "*.[ch]" | wc -l
> > 8609
> >
> > real 0m0.301s
> > user 0m0.548s
> > sys 0m0.372s
> >
> > $ time grep -w -r --include=*.[ch] "seq_printf" * | wc -l
> > 8609
> >
> > real 0m0.706s
> > user 0m0.396s
> > sys 0m0.309s
> >
>
> One important piece of information is what version of Git you are running,
>
>
> $ git tag --contains origin/ab/pcre-v2
> v2.14.0
v2.10
> ...
>
> (and the version of pcre, see the numbers)
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git/commit/?id=94da9193a6eb8f1085d611c04ff8bbb4f5ae1e0a
I definitely didn't have that one.
I recompiled git latest (with USE_LIBPCRE2) and reran.
Here are the results
$ git --version
git version 2.15.0.rc2.48.g4e40fb3
$ time git grep -P "\bseq_.*%p\W" -- "*.[ch]" | wc -l
112
real 0m0.437s
user 0m1.008s
sys 0m0.381s
So, git grep performance has already been
quite successfully improved.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-27 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-26 15:02 grep vs git grep performance? Joe Perches
2017-10-26 15:11 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2017-10-26 15:55 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-26 16:13 ` SZEDER Gábor
2017-10-26 16:20 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-26 16:58 ` Stefan Beller
2017-10-26 17:41 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-26 17:45 ` Stefan Beller
2017-10-27 17:22 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2017-10-27 22:11 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-10-27 23:22 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-28 7:45 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1509124942.1914.9.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sbeller@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).