From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5803D201B0 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2017 02:08:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751328AbdBSCI1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Feb 2017 21:08:27 -0500 Received: from homie.mail.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.208]:54516 "EHLO homiemail-a1.g.dreamhost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750893AbdBSCI0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Feb 2017 21:08:26 -0500 Received: from homiemail-a1.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a1.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3482A34806F; Sat, 18 Feb 2017 18:07:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=mattmccutchen.net; h= message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s= mattmccutchen.net; bh=paLTaNByxfZE+65VXn/AampHyg4=; b=iw+SBnX6X8 auDgA9k0Z6BgNxFckE0sSHzNd1YfhQ6xIQiM44CMzNJ8U7wOeqO3e0zWDFkZVlr+ cTfUq3V23+1dBc3p0R+847cxkGEHckstYFzRnniLKxD6mjVcmFVkEF2SUaqj466K y3wytrGuVFzDnEybeWkPZzeH6QLuQ1cf4= Received: from main (c-174-63-86-113.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [174.63.86.113]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: matt@mattmccutchen.net) by homiemail-a1.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2B6C348062; Sat, 18 Feb 2017 18:07:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1487470052.3570.7.camel@mattmccutchen.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fetch: print an error when declining to request an unadvertised object From: Matt McCutchen To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 21:07:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <1486747828.17272.5.camel@mattmccutchen.net> <1486934007.8517.10.camel@mattmccutchen.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.4 (3.22.4-2.fc25) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2017-02-12 at 15:49 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > The fact that we have the above two choices tells me that a two-step > approach may be an appropriate approach. [...] > Even if you did only the first step, as long as the second step can > be done without reverting what the first step did [*4*] by somebody > who cares the "specific error" deeply enough, I am OK with that.=C2=A0=C2= =A0Of > course if you did both steps, that is fine by me as well ;-) I appreciate the flexibility, but now that I've spent the time to understand all the code involved, it would be a pity not to go for the complete solution. New patch coming. Matt