From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5461FCC7 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 03:29:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751618AbdBGD3O (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2017 22:29:14 -0500 Received: from ns1.bonedaddy.net ([70.91.141.202]:40244 "EHLO ns1.bonedaddy.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751164AbdBGD3N (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2017 22:29:13 -0500 Received: from ns1.bonedaddy.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.bonedaddy.net (8.14.9/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v173TAdq032648; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 22:29:10 -0500 Received: (from pabs3@localhost) by ns1.bonedaddy.net (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id v173T9rB032645; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 22:29:09 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.bonedaddy.net: pabs3 set sender to pabs3@bonedaddy.net using -f Message-ID: <1486438136.16949.52.camel@bonedaddy.net> Subject: Re: idea: light-weight pull requests From: Paul Wise To: Eric Wong Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:28:56 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20170207031127.GA29468@dcvr> References: <1486427537.16949.42.camel@bonedaddy.net> <20170207031127.GA29468@dcvr> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-LFzAPrMhETZAQdC1fy0k" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.4-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org --=-LFzAPrMhETZAQdC1fy0k Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 03:11 +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > How would discussion and review happen?=C2=A0=C2=A0People seem to use > either mail, or centralized messaging (and the latter often > involves non-Free systems like GitHub or Slack). It would depend on the setup for the particular repo. Information about where that happens could be part of the output of the git push. > This is a big one.=C2=A0=C2=A0Maybe CRM114 or another generic/trainable > option can be made usable; but I think there'll always be cases > where hardcoded rules need to be written (for SpamAssassin, > at least) and real-time blacklists need to be checked. TBH, I doubt spam would become a problem at all. > Anyways, I ultimately decided it would be better to continue > supporting and improving email (which is at least entrenched in > a few communities, like this one), rather than trying to get > people to adopt something new. Email is great for people used to the old ways but it is gradually being replaced by APIs and web interfaces :( --=20 bye, pabs http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/ --=-LFzAPrMhETZAQdC1fy0k Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEYQsotVz8/kXqG1Y7MRa6Xp/6aaMFAliZPvgACgkQMRa6Xp/6 aaNEdA//clSuyRxVdElxXGpfevPsIC7pT965eixt2cPxt62aQ+W/fx5A2agMaTWr +m/I/VecjnVH/+gTnUjm8MFW4culrRPfsdYEI8orW5IqoRbEtx8y/aLzdyqVwocH fU1ft37+T7GrdAEdOWxdQzXOJVden2guljBQJXJyG999mmyZF4+Zxs83GBNRQdVW 6N9+qj3brA7DlrrsBHgogzntbGnaZ0+/7NrL9fJZzsW6cEg8POu3rraEV4CkHQcz 32112vedOA5VV9Vu++ExwIp9frvAy3OZF9GhNt233axZIpIEZ/nhRVpmG7rPLdRA JJRyJ/qJGGAhkacI3X7gQdF6Og7gYITfWqIy4SrA2b9BfcfICrYNFBzACP8Xq2Ig ctFyvRunU/M4pzqYWyJWaGmwSyUEGNqzT/xQKblCDlhFK/2Szf2dOo+8glbK9gYU EviaLZX5WT9TVUGAbA8tY8ShTOo9+ZSZf8xA6j9yj5Tspy2krde/mlgmqohACVg2 hmjiodzFL3AYY8zaAN7ZBaMODV07pu4E/G7dJmkrdzmPjv1CMxbiPu/f+l5nR2IN 1r/I/aoPa1uwqcDdOx1a1GwUdkTeY+KdnSdR3qGo2qbYiETQMUaHwIPET3eVvhd8 +Ki2BzL5UhXg3RTWa8Airof5+hQcT7DKw8VynmNzQdFGTflNlVc= =mw8k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-LFzAPrMhETZAQdC1fy0k--