From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2EC41FAFC for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 01:22:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751913AbdBGBWL (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2017 20:22:11 -0500 Received: from ns1.bonedaddy.net ([70.91.141.202]:39464 "EHLO ns1.bonedaddy.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751414AbdBGBWL (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2017 20:22:11 -0500 Received: from ns1.bonedaddy.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.bonedaddy.net (8.14.9/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v171M83t028758; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 20:22:08 -0500 Received: (from pabs3@localhost) by ns1.bonedaddy.net (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id v171M8Yp028754; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 20:22:08 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.bonedaddy.net: pabs3 set sender to pabs3@bonedaddy.net using -f Message-ID: <1486430520.16949.47.camel@bonedaddy.net> Subject: Re: idea: light-weight pull requests From: Paul Wise To: Santiago Torres Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 09:22:00 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20170207005751.cgrpwuvtljfgnntb@LykOS.localdomain> References: <1486427537.16949.42.camel@bonedaddy.net> <20170207005751.cgrpwuvtljfgnntb@LykOS.localdomain> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-71Zq7HSZEgNihvjsqcLN" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.4-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org --=-71Zq7HSZEgNihvjsqcLN Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 19:57 -0500, Santiago Torres wrote: > IMHO, the notion of a PR/MR is more specific to Git repository > management tools (e.g., GitHub, GitLab). They all have specific > concepts/ways to manage the way how their hosted repositories behave --- > and I believe this flexibility is one of the beauties in Git . I could > see how this could be implemented by tools like this rather easily > (e.g., using symlinks + inotify or something less hacky). Right, but I would like to see this everywhere (including kernel.org), so support in=C2=A0git-daemon and the http/ssh equivalents is needed too. git already has support for anonymous push but this idea is more complex. > I'm wondering if standardizing this would be more interesting to those > communities? I've pitched this to github.com/contact but couldn't find any feature request address for GitLab. > I would like to see what becomes of this. Likewise :) --=20 bye, pabs http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/ --=-71Zq7HSZEgNihvjsqcLN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEYQsotVz8/kXqG1Y7MRa6Xp/6aaMFAliZITgACgkQMRa6Xp/6 aaNvyQ//Rel3JDV4HZ/X8RuYmYchnt5gdclb+zeHasNoUrR882nHUtLdf76Ta6B/ 2W997n9YhC905Px+A20eSk1+LS/6Nwq/a5FyxyznhprwD5PsP3OOafYD+C7ouguv JtFHhDiKtgV2WXIdZlNvrASMW+X2LE/Me8PnZZA/pKThkfJh/xfRRJjtuLSHZ+VN LDdOmfBD0x7B6F40Fmy7HUFv2fE+GyFDJQ54CKSX7qneA5XubuyJ8Kbhs73fhEjh q+NeuDWGbe+c/JYHfWtx7Tpt0Xpr8CwgqdQp78mfK+8a5FrvHCtPvPFKj+OABR4D 1ioqP9xfcFdCSO8gyqfojhaYwumBjhaCQFz+/1QJBpFCSWmoWdP3Q1nCKnZD2HWH XzirxzQAxy337toqpPN3mV+kzN9xKA+R6C++gqeXLOMcEisAZBpSkxcfugeGbkQP 5Pzv9cLc5xkDN5ZO4RKYW68KpwQjBlCvnqE4SL0XL1VSEYaWQoO1K2YHVyyXpKCn 5o1H2QUsD7S5YjsNLKM9FAJvDO/fFKA4g1OwNYLQXCHT2ClmSf5xfyr+vyjVdEKH XK0eKWLKlrd8omp3vSgeaoKBC2MvYUS5paHiHtb8umu15DmJXw1MRwvkl4zNtNwB orAlWSDNXtdRMbH8WbssrxUy8H+lFbHOqdkcvhAd391jsfubKio= =StW5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-71Zq7HSZEgNihvjsqcLN--